Willful Defiance Suspensions Ban Expanded to Include Grades 4-8 Students In Favor of Restorative Justice Alternatives


Senate Bill 419 (“SB 419”), signed by Governor Newsom on Monday, September 9th, will prohibit public schools – both traditional and charter – from suspending 4th through 8th grade students for class disruption and willful defiance starting on July 1, 2020. Suspension of students in kindergarten through 3rd grade on this basis is already prohibited. The bill amended Education Code section 48900 and added section 48901.1

Opting instead for more research-based and holistic, positive alternatives to discipline, the Legislature encourages school administrators and teachers to consider alternatives to suspension to help students by keeping them at school and in the classroom and avoiding the creation of a school-to-prison-pipeline. SB 419 specifies that “it is the intent of the Legislature to provide teachers and school administrators with the means to foster safe and supportive learning environments for all children in California.”

The new legislation follows similar bans enacted at several school districts throughout California in recent years, marking a decisive step back from the harsh “zero tolerance” discipline policies that took hold decades ago. Under the new law, beginning on July 1, 2020, students enrolled in grades 4 through 8 can no longer be suspended for disrupting school activities or otherwise willfully defying school personnel engaged in the performance of their duties. Please note, however, that the Legislature built in a July 1, 2025, sunset provision for the ban as applied to 6th through 8th grade students and, as such, is expected to revisit the issue with regard to middle-schoolers before that date.

Once effective on July 1, 2020, administrators and teachers could still remove disruptive students from class (though not suspend them from school), but they are encouraged to opt instead for restorative justice practices and related alternatives to discipline, including the use of research-based frameworks with strategies that improve behavioral and academic outcomes. School officials are also encouraged to use a Multi-Tiered System of Supports, such as trauma-informed practices, social and emotional learning, and positive behavior interventions and support. The Legislature’s goal is to use such alternatives to help provide students with support to transform any trauma-related responses, understand the impact of their actions, and develop meaningful methods for repairing harm to the school community.

The so-called “willful defiance” basis for suspension has been criticized as counterproductive to student achievement and equity, as some view it as being arbitrary and often unfairly applied to students of color and students with disabilities. Some critics of the ban criticize the one-size-fits-all disciplinary approach.

Existing law allows administrators and teachers to exercise their discretion in removing students from class for disrupting school activities and willful defiance. Willful defiance suspensions were already on the decline prior to the enactment of this legislation – accounting for more than 50 percent of all suspensions at its peak, and only 16 percent in 2018.[1] SB 419, however, will require school administrators and teachers to further focus on and expand restorative practices and implement systems and approaches for responding to disciplinary disruptions at school. It will be important for schools, districts, and county offices of education to plan for this change and implement additional alternative practices in advance of the effective date of the change. Our office can provide counsel and assistance regarding compliance with the new ban on willful defiance suspensions and implementation of alternative disciplinary measures. Please contact one of the authors of this alert for further information or advice.

[1]EdSource citing CDE data titled “2017-18 Suspension Rate” at  CDE

This AALRR publication is intended for informational purposes only and should not be relied upon in reaching a conclusion in a particular area of law. Applicability of the legal principles discussed may differ substantially in individual situations. Receipt of this or any other AALRR publication does not create an attorney-client relationship. The Firm is not responsible for inadvertent errors that may occur in the publishing process. 

©2020 Atkinson, Andelson, Loya, Ruud & Romo


Related Practice Areas

Back to Page

By scrolling this page, clicking a link or continuing to browse our website, you consent to our use of cookies as described in our Cookie and Privacy Policy. If you do not wish to accept cookies from our website, or would like to stop cookies being stored on your device in the future, you can find out more and adjust your preferences here.