
Often, vendor contracts or agreements are treated as a matter of routine – a template to sign and move on. Local educational agencies (“LEA”) may be unaware of their ability (or need) to negotiate specific terms or the importance of certain clauses. In the education context, especially when student or employee data is involved, these agreements carry significant legal and operational weight. Taking a thoughtful and strategic approach to these agreements is essential for protecting LEAs and staying compliant with the law.
One area to watch for when reviewing Ed-Tech vendor agreements is navigating applicable privacy laws, including the Family Educational Rights and Privacy Act (FERPA; 20 U.S.C. § 1232g), along with California statutes governing student (Education Code § 49060 et seq.) and personnel records (Government Code § 7927.700). If student records are stored, managed, or retrieved by a third-party vendor, the contract must comply with all provisions set forth in Education Code section 49073.1. These statutes set expectations for how confidential information is protected and processed by LEAs. They apply to both the LEA and any vendor with which they contract. In practical terms, LEAs cannot assume vendors automatically understand or comply with these obligations. Ensuring alignment with these laws, and explaining what happens in the event of non-compliance or a breach, must be an intentional and explicit part of the contracting process.
In addition to defining the responsibilities of the parties, a well-written contract should allocate liability if terms are breached. A weak or incomplete contract can expose a LEA to serious risks, particularly if there is a data breach or misuse of information. Even if the LEA itself is not a party to the lawsuit, financial and legal responsibility for the claims may be shifted to the LEA via contracting terms.
Key terms or areas to review when approaching a vendor contract include: (1) Indemnification (who is responsible/liable if a lawsuit is brought against either party); (2) Warranties and Representations (assurances of functionality of the product); (3) Governing Law (should be the state your LEA is located in); (4) Insurance (it is important to have your carrier review contracts with insurance requirements); (5) Confidentiality Obligations (see above); and (6) Limitation of Liability (maximum liabilities in case of breach). Although other terms and conditions should also be reviewed and considered, these commonly impact LEA liabilities in the Ed-Tech space. Be prepared to ask questions about these provisions and understand the language in these areas.
It is important to understand what your LEA agrees to before you sign a contract. There are no guarantees that everything will operate smoothly in any contractual situation. If something goes wrong, you want to be prepared and have strong language to support your agency’s position.
If you have any questions about the topic of this blog post, please contact the authors or your regular AALRR counsel. If you would like to learn more about related topics, please join us at our TechTalk series every 3rd Monday of the month at 8:00 a.m., register online at Tech Talk: Atkinson, Andelson, Loya, Ruud & Romo.
This AALRR publication is intended for informational purposes only and should not be relied upon in reaching a conclusion in a particular area of law. Applicability of the legal principles discussed may differ substantially in individual situations. Receipt of this or any other AALRR publication does not create an attorney-client relationship. The Firm is not responsible for inadvertent errors that may occur in the publishing process.
© 2026 Atkinson, Andelson, Loya, Ruud & Romo
- Senior Associate
Dustin Stroeve represents school districts, community college districts, and county offices of education in labor and employment law and in general education matters. Mr. Stroeve provides representation, advice, and counsel on ...
- Partner
Sara Young represents school districts and other educational agencies as general counsel. Dr. Young proactively supporting agencies in ensuring practices and procedures comply with legal requirements through trainings, and ...
- Partner
Paul Z. McGlocklin represents school districts, county offices of education, community college districts, and private schools throughout California. Mr. McGlocklin primarily provides general counsel, labor, and ...
Other AALRR Blogs
Recent Posts
- Why Contracting Matters in Educational Technology
- Federal Court Evaluates Responding to Hostile Environment Claims
- Are You Ready for SB 848? Our SB 848 Toolkits are Here to Help!
- Constitutional Challenges to AI Monitoring Systems in Public Schools
- Student Complaint Against Professor for AI Usage Emphasizes Need for Educational Agencies to Provide Clear Guidance
- Recent Case Regarding AI and Academic Dishonesty Highlights Critical Need for School Districts to Implement Comprehensive AI Policies
- U.S. Court of Appeals Rules that Title IX Does not Support a Private Cause of Action for Sex Discrimination Employment
- Generative AI and Confidential Meetings: What School Leaders Need to Know about Privacy Risks
- Are You Ready for AB 2534? Our AB 2534 Toolkit Is Here to Help
- Don't Start from Scratch: Our AI Policy Toolkit Has Your District Covered
Popular Categories
- (81)
- (96)
- (43)
- (53)
- (12)
- (40)
- (22)
- (11)
- (22)
- (6)
- (4)
- (3)
- (3)
- (2)
- (2)
- (4)
- (1)
- (1)
- (1)
- (1)
- (1)
- (1)
- (1)
- (57)
Contributors
- Steven J. Andelson
- Ernest L. Bell
- Matthew T. Besmer
- William M. Betley
- Mark R. Bresee
- Ezrah K. Bryant
- Hannah S. Bushyeager
- W. Bryce Chastain
- J. Kayleigh Chevrier
- Andreas C. Chialtas
- Georgelle C. Cuevas
- Scott D. Danforth
- Alexandria M. Davidson
- Michael J. Davis
- Mary Beth de Goede
- Anthony P. De Marco
- Peter E. Denno
- William A. Diedrich
- A. Christopher Duran
- Amy W. Estrada
- Jennifer R. Fain
- Eve P. Fichtner
- Paul S. Fleck
- Mellissa E. Gallegos
- Stephanie L. Garrett
- Karen E. Gilyard
- Todd A. Goluba
- Jacqueline D. Hang
- Davina F. Harden
- Suparna Jain
- Jonathan Judge
- Warren S. Kinsler
- Nate J. Kowalski
- Michele A. Landenberger
- Tien P. Le
- Tu T. Le
- Alex A. Lozada
- Kimberly C. Ludwin
- Bryan G. Martin
- Paul Z. McGlocklin
- Stephen M. McLoughlin
- Anna J. Miller
- Jacquelyn Takeda Morenz
- Kristin M. Myers
- Katrina J. Nepacena
- Adam J. Newman
- Anthony P. Niccoli
- Beverly A. Nwanna
- Aaron V. O'Donnell
- Sharon J. Ormond
- Gabrielle E. Ortiz
- Chesley D. Quaide
- Rebeca Quintana
- Elizabeth J. Rho-Ng
- Todd M. Robbins
- Brooke Romero
- Alyssa Ruiz de Esparza
- Lauren Ruvalcaba
- Scott J. Sachs
- Gabriel A. Sandoval
- Peter A. Schaffert
- Constance J. Schwindt
- Justin R. Shinnefield
- Amber M. Solano
- David A. Soldani
- Dustin Stroeve
- Mark W. Thompson
- Emaleigh Valdez
- Jonathan S. Vick
- Jabari A. Willis
- Sara C. Young
- Elizabeth Zamora-Mejia
Archives
2026
2025
2024
2022
2021
2020
2019
2018
- December 2018
- September 2018
- August 2018
- July 2018
- June 2018
- May 2018
- April 2018
- March 2018
- January 2018
2017
- November 2017
- October 2017
- August 2017
- July 2017
- June 2017
- May 2017
- April 2017
- March 2017
- February 2017
- January 2017
2016
- November 2016
- October 2016
- September 2016
- August 2016
- July 2016
- June 2016
- May 2016
- April 2016
- March 2016
- February 2016
- January 2016
2015
- December 2015
- November 2015
- October 2015
- September 2015
- August 2015
- July 2015
- June 2015
- May 2015
- April 2015
- March 2015
- February 2015
- January 2015
2014
- December 2014
- November 2014
- October 2014
- September 2014
- August 2014
- July 2014
- June 2014
- May 2014
- April 2014
- March 2014
- February 2014
- January 2014
2013
- December 2013
- November 2013
- October 2013
- September 2013
- August 2013
- July 2013
- June 2013
- May 2013
- April 2013
- March 2013
- February 2013
- January 2013
2012
- December 2012
- November 2012
- October 2012
- September 2012
- August 2012
- July 2012
- June 2012
- May 2012
- April 2012
- March 2012
- February 2012
- January 2012


