Posts from December 2019.
12.16.2019
On December 11, 2019, the Supreme Court unanimously ruled in Peter v. NantKwest, Inc. that the United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) cannot recover the salaries of its attorneys or paralegals as “expenses” in district court cases filed under 35 U.S.C. § 145.
Categories: Business
RSS Feed
Follow us on Facebook
Follow us on Twitter
Follow us on LinkedInOther AALRR Blogs
Recent Posts
- IRS Updates Frequently Asked Questions Regarding Donations of Virtual Currency
- California’s Policy Against Non-Compete Agreements Does Not Necessarily Shield An Employee’s Actions During His Or Her Employment
- Data Privacy in California: Enforcement and Litigation Under The California Consumer Privacy Act
- Supreme Court Unanimously Rules Patent and Trademark Office Cannot Recover Attorneys’ Fees in Section 145 District Court Challenges of Patent Denial Decisions
- Substantial Performance When Time Is (Not) Of The Essence
- Anti-SLAPP Statute Does Not Apply to Actions to Enjoin Administrative Proceedings
- New California Court of Appeal Decision Provides a Basis for Finding Insurance Coverage of Wage and Hour Lawsuits under Employment Practices Liability Insurance Policies
- Infringers Profits and Willfulness: Supreme Court Set to Resolve Circuit Split Regarding Trademark Damages
- There Can Only Be One “Prevailing Party” Under A Contractual Attorney’s Fees Provision
- Words Matter in Design Patents: Federal Circuit Rules that Claim Language Can Limit the Scope of a Design Patent
Popular Categories
- (2)
- (10)
- (8)
- (8)
- (1)
- (5)
- (4)
- (4)
- (2)
- (1)
- (1)
- (1)
- (1)
- (3)
- (3)
- (1)
- (1)
- (1)
- (1)
- (1)
- (1)