Employers that have become exasperated at the regulatory zeal of the National Labor Relations Board (NLRB) in the area of workplace policies scored a welcome victory in the Fifth Circuit Court of Appeals. In T-Mobile USA, Inc. v. National Labor Relations Board, 2017 WL 3138612 (5th Cir. July 25, 2017), the Fifth Circuit refused to enforce an NLRB order that declared that an employee handbook policy requiring employees to maintain a “positive work environment” violated the National Labor Relations Act (NLRA).
In the underlying administrative decision, the NLRB held that the employer’s rule requiring a “positive working environment” had the effect of discouraging employees from engaging in concerted, protected activity under the NLRA, such as protesting the employer’s wages, hours and working conditions, or advocating for unionization.
The Fifth Circuit rejected the NLRB’s holding, finding instead that a reasonable employee would actually interpret the employer’s rule “to express a universally accepted guide for conduct in a responsible workplace.” Rather than chill “vigorous proselytizing for or against a union,” the Fifth Circuit found that the employer’s rule simply encouraged professional manners, effective and courteous behavior, common sense, and the use of “basic people skills” in the workplace. In its decision, the Fifth Circuit emphasized that the NLRB must give employer rules a “reasonable reading,” and should interpret them in light of their larger contexts.
Unfortunately, the NLRB does not consider itself bound to the decisions of the federal courts of appeals. Thus, the NLRB is not likely to change its legal standard for employer handbook rules as a direct result of the Fifth Circuit’s decision in T-Mobile. Consequently, when updating their employee handbooks, employers should remain cognizant of the NLRB’s doctrinaire rules regarding the legality of employer policies.
Atkinson, Andelson, Loya, Ruud & Romo provides employers with preventative advice and counsel on whether employee rules conform with the NLRA. We also represent employers in litigation before the NLRB. We work with employers to craft workplace rules that prioritize business objections, but also minimize the potential for NLRB litigation.
Thomas Lenz handles all aspects of labor and employment law issues and heads the firm’s traditional labor and National Labor Relations Board practices. He works with employers in all major industries across California and the ...
Brent Garrett exclusively represents management in labor and employment matters. He is also a frequent contributor to the firm’s Labor Relations Blog, providing analysis and commentary about new developments in the area of ...
Other AALRR Blogs
- The Future of Work (And Workforce Enforcement)
- NLRB Policy Shakeup: President Biden’s Notable Changes at the NLRB Could Signal a Change in Board Policy for Years to Come
- Labor Law Change Coming Soon in Biden Administration
- Private-Sector Employers Unaffected by the Supreme Court’s Janus Decision on Union Dues
- FAQ re Employees’ Weingarten Rights to Representation
- NLRB Vacates Its Hy-Brand Ruling on Joint Employer Liability
- U.S. Supreme Court Holds That Retirees’ Healthcare Benefits Clearly Expire When the Underlying Collective Bargaining Agreement Expires
- New Memo Reveals NLRB Is Considering Procedural Changes Potentially Beneficial to Employers
- Trump Selects Republican John Ring for the NLRB
- NLRB Overrides Specialty Healthcare and Returns to Prior Bargaining Unit Standard