On July 6, 2015, the United States Department of Labor published proposed regulations that would substantially increase the minimum salary that must be paid to exempt employees under federal law to $50,440 or more. The DOL published the Notice of Proposed Rulemaking was published in the Federal Register, opening a 60-day comment public comment period on the proposed amendments to Fair Labor Standards Act regulations.
Each of the executive, administrative, and professional exemptions currently require an employee be paid a minimum of $455 per week, or $23,660 per year, as a threshold qualification for application of the exemption. California white collar exemptions currently require a minimum annual salary of $37,440, which will increase to $41,600 on January 1, 2016. Thus, the salary basis under the FLSA would more than double, and would also exceed levels currently required under California law.
Proposed Increase in Salary Basis Test
The DOL’s proposed amendments to the FLSA regulations would make three substantial changes to existing law with respect to the minimum salary requirements for certain exempt employees:
- First, for employees subject to the executive, administrative, and professional exemptions, the proposed regulations would require those employees be compensated at a minimum salary level based on the 40th percentile of weekly earnings for full-time workers (based on Bureau of Labor Statistics data). The DOL projects that the 40th percentile weekly earnings for the first quarter of 2016 will be $970, or $50,440 annually.
- Second, for employees subject to executive, administrative, professional, and highly compensated employee exemptions, the required minimum weekly salaries would be automatically updated, on an annual basis, based on changes in the Consumer Price Index, with 60 days’ notice each year prior to the annual increase.
- Third, for employees subject to the highly compensated employee exemption, the proposed regulations would require those employees be compensated at a minimum salary level based on the 90th percentile of weekly earnings for full-time workers. Projected calculations for the 90th percentile of future weekly earnings would require a minimum salary of $122,148. (Note that California does not use any equivalent exemption test to the highly compensated employee federal exemption).
DOL Requests Comments on Duties Tests
Although there are no changes to the duties tests in the proposed regulations, the DOL expressed concern that the current duties tests for the exemptions may promote improper exemption of employees performing a disproportionate amount of nonexempt work. Accordingly, the DOL requested public comment as to whether it should modify the standard duties tests applicable to the exemptions.
The DOL also invited public comment on issues including:
- Whether employees should be required to spend a minimum amount of time performing exempt work to qualify for an exemption (similar to California’s current standard requiring 50 percent or more of the employee’s time conducting exempt duties);
- Whether the DOL rules should reinstate the long and short tests that were used prior to 2004 (the last time these regulations were updated);
- Whether to continue to use the concurrent duties regulation;
- Whether to permit non-discretionary bonuses and incentive payments to count toward a portion of the salary test; and
- Whether changes should be adopted for computer-related fields.
Next Steps
The DOL’s proposed amendments to the FLSA regulations are not final. The Administrative Procedure Act’s rulemaking process provides for a public comment period on proposed amendments. Here, the comment period is 60 days, which is set to close on September 4, 2015. Sometime after the close of the public comment period, the DOL will draft final regulations. The Office of Management and Budget’s Office of Information and Regulatory Affairs (“OMB”) will then conduct a final review, approve the regulation text, and publish the final regulation in the Federal Register. This final review process typically runs no more than 90 days, which may be extended by 30 days on a one-time basis.
Thus, the final rule is not expected to be published until late in the year, with an effective date expected to be sometime in 2016.
The proposed regulations are part of a broader effort by the Administration to revamp federal labor and employment standards, which will also include long-awaited guidance on independent contractor classification issues to be issued soon by the Wage and Hour Division. We will continue to monitor and update on these developments.
- Partner
Jonathan Judge advises employers in various labor and employment law matters, including drug testing, mass layoffs (WARN), disparate impact analysis, immigration compliance, trade secrets, privacy, technology in the ...
- Partner
Robert Fried is a management defense attorney, expert witness and mediator in single employer and class action cases. He sustains an ongoing national practice in wage and hour law, federal and state prevailing wage and public works ...
Other AALRR Blogs
Recent Posts
- President Biden’s Administration Halts Department of Labor’s Final Rule for Worker Classification
- Rotational Employees Can Have Their “On” And “Off” Weeks Counted Against Their FMLA Leave Entitlement
- Ninth Circuit Issues Important Decision on Per Diem Pay
- Ninth Circuit Upholds Victory for Trucking Industry: California Meal and Rest Break Rules Preempted by Federal Law as to Commercial Drivers
- They Say Never Discuss Politics In Polite Company, But How Can Employers Handle Impolitic Off-Duty Conduct?
- DOL Permits Back-of-the-Restaurant Staff to Share in Servers’ Tips
- Can California Employers Be Liable For Failure To Prevent Something That Never Happened?
- Employer’s Delay is Fatal to Enforcement of Arbitration Agreement
- California Employers: The federal Department Of Labor’s Final Rule For Worker Classifications Does Not Eliminate The Requirements Under California’s ABC Test
- Court Holds California Law Applies to Offshore Workers on Oil Platforms
Popular Categories
- (43)
- (40)
- (135)
- (22)
- (6)
- (6)
- (31)
- (26)
- (22)
- (14)
- (5)
- (6)
- (4)
- (3)
- (3)
- (14)
- (9)
- (2)
- (2)
- (1)
- (3)
- (1)
- (3)
- (1)
- (1)
- (2)
- (1)
- (1)
- (1)
- (1)
- (1)
- (1)
- (1)
Contributors
- Christopher S. Andre
- Cindy Strom Arellano
- Sarkis A. Atoyan
- Alicia A. Belock
- Eddy R. Beltran
- Rex Darrell Berry
- William M. Betley
- Brigham M. Cheney
- Michele L. Collender
- Kevin R. Dale
- Scott K. Dauscher
- Alexandria M. Davidson
- William A. Diedrich
- Alfonso Estrada
- Lauren D. Fierro
- Paul S. Fleck
- Robert Fried
- L. Brent Garrett
- Carol A. Gefis
- Kieran D. Hartley
- Amber S. Healy
- Jonathan Judge
- David Kang
- Nate J. Kowalski
- Joshua N. Lange
- Catherine M. Lee
- Thomas A. Lenz
- David M. Lester
- Martin S. Li
- Mia A. Lomedico
- Jorge J. Luna
- Michael J. Morphew
- Ronald W. Novotny
- Michael J. O'Connor, Jr.
- Aaron V. O'Donnell
- Shawn M. Ogle
- Sharon J. Ormond
- Justin R. Peters
- Chesley D. Quaide
- Todd M. Robbins
- Irma Rodríguez Moisa
- Casandra P. Secord
- Jon M. Setoguchi
- Lauren B. Shelby
- Ann K. Smith
- Amber M. Solano
- Susana P. Solano
- Ethan G. Solove
- Susan M. Steward
- April Szabo
- Jay G. Trinnaman
- Jonathan S. Vick
- Robert L. Wenzel
- Brian M. Wheeler
- Glen A. Williams
- Kimberley A. Worley
- Lisa C. Zaradich
Archives
2021
2020
- December 2020
- October 2020
- August 2020
- July 2020
- June 2020
- May 2020
- April 2020
- March 2020
- January 2020
2019
- December 2019
- November 2019
- October 2019
- September 2019
- August 2019
- June 2019
- May 2019
- April 2019
- March 2019
- February 2019
2018
- December 2018
- November 2018
- October 2018
- September 2018
- August 2018
- July 2018
- June 2018
- May 2018
- March 2018
- February 2018
- January 2018
2017
- December 2017
- November 2017
- October 2017
- September 2017
- August 2017
- June 2017
- May 2017
- March 2017
- February 2017
2016
- December 2016
- November 2016
- October 2016
- September 2016
- August 2016
- July 2016
- June 2016
- May 2016
- April 2016
- March 2016
- February 2016
2015
- December 2015
- October 2015
- September 2015
- August 2015
- July 2015
- June 2015
- May 2015
- April 2015
- March 2015
- February 2015
- January 2015
2014
- November 2014
- October 2014
- September 2014
- August 2014
- July 2014
- June 2014
- May 2014
- April 2014
- February 2014
- January 2014
2013
- October 2013
- September 2013
- July 2013
- June 2013
- May 2013
- April 2013
- March 2013
- February 2013
- January 2013
2012
- October 2012
- September 2012
- August 2012
- July 2012
- June 2012
- May 2012
- April 2012
- March 2012
- February 2012
- January 2012
2011
- December 2011
- November 2011
- October 2011
- September 2011
- August 2011
- July 2011
- June 2011
- May 2011
- April 2011
- March 2011
- February 2011
- January 2011