Recent mass layoffs by tech companies, such as Twitter and Meta, have made headlines. The massive layoff by Twitter on November 4, 2022 has already resulted in a lawsuit filed by former Twitter employees for violations of the federal Worker Adjustment and Retraining Notification (“WARN”) Act. The WARN Act requires certain employers to provide 60-day advance notice in cases of qualified plant closings and mass layoffs, allowing employees and their families with transition time to seek alternate employment or skills training.
Many states, including California, have their own versions of the WARN Act. The California WARN Act applies to any employer who directly or indirectly owns and operates an industrial or commercial facility with 75 or more full-time employees within the preceding 12 months of an event that requires notice under the Act.
Who is Required to Provide WARN Notification and to Which Employees?
WARN notification is required when employers conduct a mass layoff, relocation, or termination. A mass layoff occurs when 50 or more employees are laid off during any 30 day period. Relocation refers to the removal of operations to a location 100 or more miles away. Termination occurs when an employer ceases operations or substantially ceases operations at an industrial or commercial facility.
Employees covered by the California WARN Act include all affected hourly and salaried employees who work for at least 6 months of the 12 months preceding the triggering event. Notice must also be provided to those affected who are on workers’ compensation, medical, pregnancy disability, or other leaves. The California WARN Act does not apply to employees who were hired with an understanding that their employment was seasonal and temporary or employees in certain industries where their employment was limited to a particular project or undertaking. See California Labor Code section 1400(g)(1).
Exceptions to the California WARN Act exist for a faltering business that is seeking capital to avoid or postpone a shutdown, physical calamity, or an act of war.
How does an Employer Provide Sufficient WARN Notification?
Under the California WARN Act, notice must be provided in clear and concise language to all affected employees, consistent with the federal WARN Act. The federal WARN Act provides that notice must include the following:
(1) a statement of whether the layoff is permanent or temporary;
(2) the date when the layoff will commence;
(3) an indication of whether or not bumping rights exist (rights of an employee with more seniority to bump those with less seniority); and
(4) contact information for a company official where the employee can obtain further information.
Employers must also notify the Employment Development Department, the local workforce investment board, as well as the chief elect official of the city and county government where the mass layoff, relocation, or termination is to occur. If the affected employees are represented by a union, specific notice and bargaining with the union may also be required.
What are the Penalties for Violating the WARN Act?
The penalties for violations of the WARN Act are steeper in California than under federal law. The federal WARN Act requires an employer who violated the Act to provide the employees with back pay and benefits for the period of up to 60 days. The California WARN Act requires an employer to provide the employees with back pay, benefits, and provides for a civil penalty of $500 per day. In addition, employees who file a lawsuit for violations of the California WARN Act may be entitled to reasonable attorneys’ fees and costs.
Before conducting a mass layoff, you should consult with the authors or your trusted counsel at AALRR to ensure compliance with the WARN Act.
This AALRR post is intended for informational purposes only and should not be relied upon in reaching a conclusion in a particular area of law. Applicability of the legal principles discussed may differ substantially in individual situations. Receipt of this or any other AALRR publication does not create an attorney-client relationship. The Firm is not responsible for inadvertent errors that may occur in the publishing process. © 2022 Atkinson, Andelson, Loya, Ruud & Romo
Other AALRR Blogs
Recent Posts
- California’s Minimum Wage to Increase to $16.50 Per Hour January 1, 2025
- New San Diego County Fair Chance Ordinance Restricts Employers’ Use of Criminal History
- New Los Angeles County Fair Chance Ordinance Restricts Employers’ Use of Criminal History
- Legislation Impacting California Employee Handbook Policies for 2025
- Update on the California Health Care Minimum Wage
- Resources for California Employers to Track and Confirm Their State and Local Minimum Wage Requirements
- 11 Local Minimum Wage Ordinances Poised to Increase on July 1, 2024
- Fast Food Restaurants -- Be Prepared for a DIR Audit
- U.S. Supreme Court Lowers Bar for Proving Discrimination Claims
- Governor Signs Urgency Legislation Exempting Certain Restaurants from New Fast Food Minimum Wage
Popular Categories
- (54)
- (156)
- (39)
- (25)
- (7)
- (42)
- (36)
- (23)
- (15)
- (15)
- (6)
- (7)
- (6)
- (6)
- (9)
- (6)
- (4)
- (2)
- (3)
- (2)
- (2)
- (2)
- (2)
- (3)
- (3)
- (1)
- (1)
- (2)
- (1)
- (1)
- (1)
- (1)
- (1)
- (1)
- (1)
- (1)
Contributors
- Cindy Strom Arellano
- Sarkis A. Atoyan
- Eddy R. Beltran
- William M. Betley
- Brigham M. Cheney
- Michele L. Collender
- Kevin R. Dale
- Scott K. Dauscher
- Alexandria M. Davidson
- William A. Diedrich
- Paul S. Fleck
- Lauren S. Gafa
- L. Brent Garrett
- Evan J. Gautier
- Carol A. Gefis
- Jennifer S. Grock
- Jonathan Judge
- David Kang
- Nate J. Kowalski
- Joshua N. Lange
- Catherine M. Lee
- Thomas A. Lenz
- David M. Lester
- Martin S. Li
- Jorge J. Luna
- Brian D. Martin
- Ronald W. Novotny
- Michael J. O'Connor, Jr.
- Aaron V. O'Donnell
- Shawn M. Ogle
- Sharon J. Ormond
- Nora Pasin
- Joseph E. Pelochino
- Chesley D. Quaide
- Todd M. Robbins
- Irma Rodríguez Moisa
- Saba Salamatian
- Casandra P. Secord
- Jon M. Setoguchi
- Ann K. Smith
- Amber M. Solano
- Susana P. Solano
- Susan M. Steward
- April Szabo
- Jay G. Trinnaman
- Jonathan S. Vick
- Robert L. Wenzel
- Brian M. Wheeler
- Glen A. Williams
Archives
2024
2023
2022
- November 2022
- October 2022
- September 2022
- July 2022
- June 2022
- May 2022
- April 2022
- March 2022
- February 2022
- January 2022
2021
- November 2021
- October 2021
- September 2021
- July 2021
- June 2021
- May 2021
- April 2021
- March 2021
- February 2021
- January 2021
2020
- December 2020
- October 2020
- August 2020
- July 2020
- June 2020
- May 2020
- April 2020
- March 2020
- January 2020
2019
- December 2019
- November 2019
- October 2019
- September 2019
- August 2019
- June 2019
- May 2019
- April 2019
- March 2019
- February 2019
2018
- December 2018
- November 2018
- October 2018
- September 2018
- August 2018
- July 2018
- June 2018
- May 2018
- March 2018
- February 2018
- January 2018
2017
- December 2017
- November 2017
- October 2017
- September 2017
- August 2017
- June 2017
- May 2017
- March 2017
- February 2017
2016
- December 2016
- November 2016
- October 2016
- September 2016
- August 2016
- July 2016
- June 2016
- May 2016
- April 2016
- March 2016
- February 2016
2015
- December 2015
- October 2015
- September 2015
- August 2015
- July 2015
- June 2015
- May 2015
- April 2015
- March 2015
- February 2015
- January 2015
2014
- November 2014
- October 2014
- September 2014
- August 2014
- July 2014
- June 2014
- May 2014
- April 2014
- February 2014
- January 2014
2013
- October 2013
- September 2013
- July 2013
- June 2013
- May 2013
- April 2013
- March 2013
- February 2013
- January 2013
2012
- October 2012
- September 2012
- August 2012
- July 2012
- June 2012
- May 2012
- April 2012
- March 2012
- February 2012
- January 2012
2011
- December 2011
- November 2011
- October 2011
- September 2011
- August 2011
- July 2011
- June 2011
- May 2011
- April 2011
- March 2011
- February 2011
- January 2011