Many employers have attempted to require current and former employees to pursue claims individually and not by way of class action lawsuits by requiring employees to agree to arbitrate individually whatever claims they might have.
The Los Angeles Daily Journal reports today that the Consumer Attorneys of California, a trade association of plaintiff's attorneys, is sponsoring a California Senate Bill that would make class action waivers unenforceable. State Senator Noreen Evans (D-Santa Rosa) is expected to introduce today a bill stating as follows:
Any term in a contract of adhesion purporting to waive the right to join or consolidate claims, or to bring a claim as a representative member of a class or in a private attorney general capacity shall be deemed to lack the necessary consent to waive that right, and is void.
Today's action is a reaction to the landmark decision of the Supreme Court of the United States in AT&T Mobility LLC v. Vincent Concepcion, previously discussed here, reversing a decision of the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit holding (1) that an arbitration agreement between AT&T and its cell phone customers requiring customers to bring claims in their "'individual capacity, and not as a plaintiff or class member in any purported class or representative proceeding'" is unconscionable and therefore unenforceable because,"AT&T had not shown that . . . arbitration adequately substituted for the deterrent effect of class actions" and (2) that the basis for the finding of unconscionability "was not preempted by the [Federal Arbitration Act ('FAA')]." In other words, the Supreme Court rejected lower courts' analyses of the issue and held that arbitration agreements are generally enforceable according to their terms under the FAA, and neither California courts nor other courts can evade the FAA merely by declaring an arbitration agreement to be "unconscionable" in whole or in part. The Court explained "the judicial hostility towards arbitration that prompted the FAA had manifested itself in 'a great variety' of devices and formulas' declaring arbitration against public policy."
Although the Supreme Court's landmark ruling concerned an arbitration provision of a consumer contract and not an arbitration agreement between an employer and an employee, we think the holding and the reasoning of the decision apply with equal or nearly equal force to arbitration agreements between employers and employees. In Southland Corp., v. Keating, the Supreme Court held the FAA applies to state courts and is intended to preempt state anti-arbitration laws to the contrary, and in Circuit City Stores, Inc. v. Stain Clair Adams, the Supreme Court held the FAA generally applies to employment contracts.
The Consumer Attorneys of California describe the bill as one of the group's top priorities for 2012, stating:
The United States Supreme Court in April 2011 issued a devastating 5-to-4 opinion that dramatically tilted the playing field in favor of corporations in class actions. Concepcion set a dangerous precedent by allowing AT&T to enforce a contract provision that requires customers to arbitrate their disputes individually, rather than class-wide. (AT&T Mobility LLC v. Concepcion (2011) 131 S.Ct. 1740, 179 L.Ed.2d 742.) CAOC believes that legislation is needed to restore the right to join claims while not interfering with the Federal Arbitration Act (FAA) or frustrating its purpose. CAOC is working with the Consumer Federation of California and labor groups and will be introducing legislation authored by Senate Judiciary and Women's Caucus Chair Noreen Evans (D-Santa Rosa).
It remains to be seen whether the bill will be adopted and remains to be seen whether if adopted the legislation would effectively skirt the FAA Act and the Supreme Court's decision in Concepcion. In any event, we will monitor this new proposed legislation and report here further developments.
- Partner
Scott Dauscher is Chair of the firm’s Commercial and Complex Litigation Practice Group. He also serves as Chair of the firm’s Class Action Defense Group, managing AALRR’s extensive class action practice and its team of ...
- Partner
Christopher Andre is a seasoned civil litigator who focuses his practice on civil litigation and advising and representing employers. Mr. Andre is an editor of and frequent contributor to the firm’s Labor and Employment Law ...
Other AALRR Blogs
Recent Posts
- You’ve Settled Your Employee’s Harassment Claim – Now, is it Deductible?
- IRS Posts 2018 W-4 and Encourages Taxpayers to Use New Withholding Calculator
- Labor Commissioner Posts AB 450 FAQ and Sample Notice to Employees of I-9 Inspection
- New Year, New Updates to the Paid Family Leave and Disability Benefit Programs
- Mandatory Transgender Rights Poster Is Now Available
- California Federal Jury Clears Dollar Tree in Wage Statement Class Action
- One-Sided Arbitration Agreement Held Invalid
- Employer Held Potentially Liable for Failure to Prevent Sexual Assault
- California Governor Signs Bill Expanding Baby Bonding Leave to Mid-Size Employers
- Caught Between a Rock and a Hard Place - AB 450 Imposes New Legal Requirements for Employers During Worksite Immigration Enforcement Actions
Popular Categories
- (94)
- (12)
- (25)
- (32)
- (33)
- (9)
- (12)
- (15)
- (9)
- (14)
- (2)
- (3)
- (3)
- (2)
- (1)
- (1)
- (1)
- (1)
- (1)
- (1)
- (1)
- (1)
- (1)
- (1)
Contributors
- Christopher S. Andre
- Cindy Strom Arellano
- William M. Betley
- Kevin R. Dale
- Scott K. Dauscher
- Alexandria M. Davidson
- William A. Diedrich
- Alfonso Estrada
- Cathie L. Fields
- Paul S. Fleck
- Robert Fried
- L. Brent Garrett
- Carol A. Gefis
- Amber S. Healy
- Andres C. Hurwitz
- Jonathan Judge
- Nate J. Kowalski
- Thomas A. Lenz
- Elizabeth P. Lind
- Jorge J. Luna
- Ronald W. Novotny
- Aaron V. O'Donnell
- Shawn M. Ogle
- Sharon J. Ormond
- Chesley D. Quaide
- Todd M. Robbins
- Irma Rodríguez Moisa
- Allison M. Scott
- Casandra P. Secord
- Jon M. Setoguchi
- Amber M. Solano
- Susan M. Steward
- Jay G. Trinnaman
- Chelsea N. Trotter
- Robert L. Wenzel
- Timothy M. Wojcik
- Lisa C. Zaradich
Archives
2018
2017
- December 2017
- November 2017
- October 2017
- September 2017
- August 2017
- June 2017
- May 2017
- March 2017
- February 2017
2016
- December 2016
- November 2016
- October 2016
- September 2016
- August 2016
- July 2016
- June 2016
- May 2016
- April 2016
- March 2016
- February 2016
2015
- December 2015
- October 2015
- September 2015
- August 2015
- July 2015
- June 2015
- May 2015
- April 2015
- March 2015
- February 2015
- January 2015
2014
- November 2014
- October 2014
- September 2014
- August 2014
- July 2014
- June 2014
- May 2014
- April 2014
- February 2014
- January 2014
2013
- October 2013
- September 2013
- July 2013
- June 2013
- May 2013
- April 2013
- March 2013
- February 2013
- January 2013
2012
- October 2012
- September 2012
- August 2012
- July 2012
- June 2012
- May 2012
- April 2012
- March 2012
- February 2012
- January 2012
2011
- December 2011
- November 2011
- October 2011
- September 2011
- August 2011
- July 2011
- June 2011
- May 2011
- April 2011
- March 2011
- February 2011
- January 2011