Plaintiffs File Petition For Rehearing Of California Supreme Court Decision Clarifying Who Can Be Liable As An "Employer"

As we previously reported here, on May 20, 2010, by a unanimous decision in Martinez v. Corky N. Combs, the California Supreme Court clarified the standard courts must use to determine who is liable as an "employer" for violations of wage and hour laws embodied in Industrial Welfare Commission ("IWC") Wage Orders, including claims for unpaid or underpaid wages.  In that case, the plaintiffs sought to hold customers of the employer liable for their claims for allegedly unpaid wages. The trial court, the Court of Appeal, and the California Supreme Court all rejected the plaintiffs' arguments.

Today, the plaintiffs filed in the California Supreme Court a petition for a rehearing of the case. Because the Supreme Court's decision was a unanimous decision and because petitions for rehearing are seldom granted, we think the Court will very likely deny the petition and allow its May 20, 2010 decision to stand.  In any event, we will report here any further significant developments.

Other AALRR Blogs

Recent Posts

Popular Categories



Back to Page

By scrolling this page, clicking a link or continuing to browse our website, you consent to our use of cookies as described in our Cookie and Privacy Policy. If you do not wish to accept cookies from our website, or would like to stop cookies being stored on your device in the future, you can find out more and adjust your preferences here.