On February 27, 2013, the Department of Labor (“DOL”) published interim final regulations regarding employee whistleblowing complaints under the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act (“ACA” a.k.a. the healthcare reform act). The regulations allow employees to file complaints with the Occupational Safety & Health Administration (“OSHA”) against their employers (and health insurance providers) for certain violations of the ACA.
Section 1558 of the ACA provides protection to employees against retaliation by an employer for (1) reporting violations under Title I of the ACA, or (2) for receiving a health insurance tax credit or cost sharing reduction as a result of participating in a health insurance exchange created pursuant to the ACA.
Title I of the ACA implemented consumer protections in the health insurance market such as prohibitions on annual and lifetime coverage limits, prohibitions on exclusions based on pre-existing conditions, expansion of coverage to dependents to age 26, and coverage of preventative services.
Under the ACA, large employers (generally those with 50 or more full-time equivalent employees) will be required to offer their full-time employees (those averaging 30 or more hours per week) with affordable and qualifying health insurance coverage starting on January 1, 2014. A large employer that does not offer affordable and qualifying health insurance may face penalties assessed by the Internal Revenue Service (“IRS”) if a full-time employee purchases health insurance from an exchange and obtains a subsidy from the government. The regulations contemplate that assessment of such penalties will create incentive for employers to retaliate against employees.
An employer may be found to have violated the ACA anti-retaliation provision if an employee’s protected activity was a contributing factor in the employer’s decision to take unfavorable employment action against the employee. Such unfavorable actions may include: firing or laying off; blacklisting; demoting; denying overtime or promotion; disciplining; denying benefits; failure to hire or rehire; intimidation; making threats, reassignments affecting prospects for promotion; or reducing pay or hours.
Under the procedure, employees will have 180 days after an alleged violation to file a complaint with OSHA. Employers will have 20 days from receipt of notice of the complaint to show by clear and convincing evidence that it would have taken the same action in absence of the protected activity. If the employer fails to establish this evidence, OSHA will proceed with its investigation, with the power to request documents and conduct interviews.
After completing its investigation, OSHA will issue a preliminary order. If adverse to the employer, the order may require reinstatement, back wages, restoration of benefits, and other possible relief to make the employee whole, including attorneys’ fees and expert witness fees. On the other hand, if OSHA finds the employee’s complaint is frivolous or brought in bad faith, OSHA may award the employer a reasonable attorneys’ fee not exceeding $1,000.
The order becomes final unless appealed within 30 days to the Secretary of Labor. If appealed, an Administrative Law Judge (“ALJ”) will conduct a hearing, and will issue a decision.
Either party may appeal the ALJ’s decision within 14 days to the DOL’s Administrative Review Board (“ARB”). The ARB has 30 days to decide whether to review. If it does not review, the ALJ decision will become final. If the ARB grants review, it will be required to issue its final decision within 120 days.
Within 60 days of the ARB’s final decision, an aggrieved party may file an appeal with the United States Court of Appeals for the circuit in which the violation occurred or the circuit where the employee resided on the date of the violation.
Alternatively, if a final order is not issued within 210 days from the date the employee files the initial claim with OSHA, or within 90 days of the employee receiving OSHA’s preliminary findings, the employee may file a complaint in U.S. District Court for de novo review, which may be tried before a jury at either party’s request.
Whether an employee recently filed a complaint regarding health insurance coverage, or if the employer is penalized because the employee received subsidies under the ACA to purchase health insurance will become additional factors that employers will need to review before taking adverse action against employees. Documentation will be key to establishing the required clear and convincing evidence for early resolution of such complaints.
The interim final regulations are currently subject to a 60-day comment period from the date of publication in the Federal Register. The DOL will issue final regulations once the comment period closes and it has reviewed the submitted comments.
- Partner
Jonathan Judge heads the Private Labor and Employment Group’s Advice and Counsel Team of attorneys. He represents clients, large and small, in employment advice and counsel matters including wage and hour, leaves of absence, and ...
Other AALRR Blogs
Recent Posts
- An Early Holiday Present For Employers Facing Out Of Control Plaintiff Attorney Greed
- California’s Minimum Wage to Increase to $16.50 Per Hour January 1, 2025
- New San Diego County Fair Chance Ordinance Restricts Employers’ Use of Criminal History
- New Los Angeles County Fair Chance Ordinance Restricts Employers’ Use of Criminal History
- Legislation Impacting California Employee Handbook Policies for 2025
- Update on the California Health Care Minimum Wage
- Resources for California Employers to Track and Confirm Their State and Local Minimum Wage Requirements
- 11 Local Minimum Wage Ordinances Poised to Increase on July 1, 2024
- Fast Food Restaurants -- Be Prepared for a DIR Audit
- U.S. Supreme Court Lowers Bar for Proving Discrimination Claims
Popular Categories
- (37)
- (156)
- (54)
- (39)
- (25)
- (7)
- (42)
- (23)
- (15)
- (15)
- (6)
- (7)
- (6)
- (6)
- (9)
- (6)
- (4)
- (2)
- (3)
- (2)
- (2)
- (2)
- (2)
- (3)
- (3)
- (1)
- (1)
- (2)
- (1)
- (1)
- (1)
- (1)
- (1)
- (1)
- (1)
- (1)
Contributors
- Cindy Strom Arellano
- Sarkis A. Atoyan
- Eddy R. Beltran
- William M. Betley
- Brigham M. Cheney
- Michele L. Collender
- Kevin R. Dale
- Scott K. Dauscher
- Alexandria M. Davidson
- William A. Diedrich
- Paul S. Fleck
- Lauren S. Gafa
- L. Brent Garrett
- Evan J. Gautier
- Carol A. Gefis
- Jennifer S. Grock
- Jonathan Judge
- David Kang
- Nate J. Kowalski
- Joshua N. Lange
- Catherine M. Lee
- Thomas A. Lenz
- David M. Lester
- Martin S. Li
- Jorge J. Luna
- Brian D. Martin
- Ronald W. Novotny
- Michael J. O'Connor, Jr.
- Aaron V. O'Donnell
- Shawn M. Ogle
- Sharon J. Ormond
- Nora Pasin
- Joseph E. Pelochino
- Chesley D. Quaide
- Todd M. Robbins
- Irma Rodríguez Moisa
- Saba Salamatian
- Casandra P. Secord
- Jon M. Setoguchi
- Ann K. Smith
- Amber M. Solano
- Susana P. Solano
- Susan M. Steward
- April Szabo
- Jay G. Trinnaman
- Jonathan S. Vick
- Robert L. Wenzel
- Brian M. Wheeler
- Glen A. Williams
Archives
2024
2023
2022
- November 2022
- October 2022
- September 2022
- July 2022
- June 2022
- May 2022
- April 2022
- March 2022
- February 2022
- January 2022
2021
- November 2021
- October 2021
- September 2021
- July 2021
- June 2021
- May 2021
- April 2021
- March 2021
- February 2021
- January 2021
2020
- December 2020
- October 2020
- August 2020
- July 2020
- June 2020
- May 2020
- April 2020
- March 2020
- January 2020
2019
- December 2019
- November 2019
- October 2019
- September 2019
- August 2019
- June 2019
- May 2019
- April 2019
- March 2019
- February 2019
2018
- December 2018
- November 2018
- October 2018
- September 2018
- August 2018
- July 2018
- June 2018
- May 2018
- March 2018
- February 2018
- January 2018
2017
- December 2017
- November 2017
- October 2017
- September 2017
- August 2017
- June 2017
- May 2017
- March 2017
- February 2017
2016
- December 2016
- November 2016
- October 2016
- September 2016
- August 2016
- July 2016
- June 2016
- May 2016
- April 2016
- March 2016
- February 2016
2015
- December 2015
- October 2015
- September 2015
- August 2015
- July 2015
- June 2015
- May 2015
- April 2015
- March 2015
- February 2015
- January 2015
2014
- November 2014
- October 2014
- September 2014
- August 2014
- July 2014
- June 2014
- May 2014
- April 2014
- February 2014
- January 2014
2013
- October 2013
- September 2013
- July 2013
- June 2013
- May 2013
- April 2013
- March 2013
- February 2013
- January 2013
2012
- October 2012
- September 2012
- August 2012
- July 2012
- June 2012
- May 2012
- April 2012
- March 2012
- February 2012
- January 2012
2011
- December 2011
- November 2011
- October 2011
- September 2011
- August 2011
- July 2011
- June 2011
- May 2011
- April 2011
- March 2011
- February 2011
- January 2011