In Anthony v. TRAX International Corp. (April 17, 2020, Case No. 18-15662), the Ninth Circuit held the limitation of using after-acquired evidence to merely mitigate damages did not extend to evidence used to show that an Americans with Disabilities Act (“ADA”) plaintiff is not a qualified individual, an element of a prima facie case of disability discrimination.
The Ninth Circuit affirmed a summary judgment motion under the ADA. Sunny Anthony had a history of post-traumatic stress disorder and related anxiety and depression that resulted in her taking leave under the Family and Medical Leave Act (“FMLA”). When Anthony was unable to return to work at the end of her FMLA leave, she was terminated. Anthony soon thereafter filed a disability discrimination and failure to engage in the interactive process lawsuit.
During the course of discovery, TRAX learned that Anthony did not have a bachelor’s degree, which was a prerequisite for her former technical writer position. Anthony argued that her lack of a bachelor’ degree was after-acquired evidence discovered well after the discriminatory adverse action and at most should be used to limit liability. The Ninth Circuit held “[a]n employer’s ignorance cannot create a credential where there is none;” and “[a]ccepting Anthony’s argument would extend coverage [of the ADA] to those who do not in fact satisfy the job’s prerequisites — including those who successfully deceived their employer as to qualifications.” The Court concluded that this lack of a prerequisite for the position established that Anthony was not a qualified individual; and therefore, not entitled to the protections of the ADA. Under the two-step qualified individual test promulgated by the EEOC, an individual who fails to satisfy the job prerequisites cannot be considered “qualified” under the ADA. The regulations interpreting qualified individual hold that someone is qualified where the individual: (1) satisfies the requisite skill, experience, education, and other job-related requirements of the employment position, and (2) who with or without reasonable accommodation can perform the essential functions of such position. 29 C.F.R. § 1630.2(m).
The Ninth Circuit also held that an employer is obligated to engage in the interactive process only if the individual is otherwise qualified. If a disabled employee does not independently satisfy the job prerequisites, the employee is not otherwise qualified, and the employer is not obligated to furnish any reasonable accommodation nor engage in the interactive process.
Although no California court has analyzed whether the two-step qualified individual test applies to the definition of qualified employee under the Fair Employment and Housing Act (“FEHA”), in Green v. State of California (2007) 42 Cal.4th 254, the California Supreme Court analyzed “qualified individual” under FEHA and held: “This similarity between the state and federal enactments is not a coincidence, but reflects the Legislature’s deliberate effort in 1992 to conform the FEHA to this ADA provision.” Id. at 262-63. In Pensinger v. Bowsmith, Inc. (1998) 60 Cal.App.4th 707, the court recognized that because the FEHA is modeled after the ADA, interpretations of the federal act are a useful guide to interpreting and construing the FEHA. Id. at 719. Moreover, in Kelly v. Corrections Corp. of America (E.D. Cal. 2010) 750 F.Supp.2d 1132, the court held that it is appropriate to import the ADA’s two-step definition of qualified individual. Id. at 1139. Thus, if an employer can establish an employee was not qualified for a position, then under both state and federal law such employee cannot avail themselves of the protections under disability laws. This remains true even if the employer does not become aware of missing job prerequisites until after the employee is terminated.
This AALRR post is intended for informational purposes only and should not be relied upon in reaching a conclusion in a particular area of law. Applicability of the legal principles discussed may differ substantially in individual situations. Receipt of this or any other AALRR publication does not create an attorney-client relationship. The Firm is not responsible for inadvertent errors that may occur in the publishing process.
© 2020 Atkinson, Andelson, Loya, Ruud & Romo
- Partner
David Lester represents and advises private employers on a variety of labor relations, corporate, and litigation matters including class action wage and hour, trade secrets and unfair competition, sexual harassment and sexual ...
- Of Counsel
Ronald Novotny has been representing employers in labor and employment matters in federal and state courts and administrative agencies in California since 1981. He has extensive experience involving union and employer unfair ...
Other AALRR Blogs
Recent Posts
- President Biden’s Administration Halts Department of Labor’s Final Rule for Worker Classification
- Rotational Employees Can Have Their “On” And “Off” Weeks Counted Against Their FMLA Leave Entitlement
- Ninth Circuit Issues Important Decision on Per Diem Pay
- Ninth Circuit Upholds Victory for Trucking Industry: California Meal and Rest Break Rules Preempted by Federal Law as to Commercial Drivers
- They Say Never Discuss Politics In Polite Company, But How Can Employers Handle Impolitic Off-Duty Conduct?
- DOL Permits Back-of-the-Restaurant Staff to Share in Servers’ Tips
- Can California Employers Be Liable For Failure To Prevent Something That Never Happened?
- Employer’s Delay is Fatal to Enforcement of Arbitration Agreement
- California Employers: The federal Department Of Labor’s Final Rule For Worker Classifications Does Not Eliminate The Requirements Under California’s ABC Test
- Court Holds California Law Applies to Offshore Workers on Oil Platforms
Popular Categories
- (43)
- (40)
- (135)
- (22)
- (6)
- (6)
- (31)
- (26)
- (22)
- (14)
- (5)
- (6)
- (4)
- (3)
- (3)
- (14)
- (9)
- (2)
- (2)
- (1)
- (3)
- (1)
- (3)
- (1)
- (1)
- (2)
- (1)
- (1)
- (1)
- (1)
- (1)
- (1)
- (1)
Contributors
- Christopher S. Andre
- Cindy Strom Arellano
- Sarkis A. Atoyan
- Alicia A. Belock
- Eddy R. Beltran
- Rex Darrell Berry
- William M. Betley
- Brigham M. Cheney
- Michele L. Collender
- Kevin R. Dale
- Scott K. Dauscher
- Alexandria M. Davidson
- William A. Diedrich
- Alfonso Estrada
- Lauren D. Fierro
- Paul S. Fleck
- Robert Fried
- L. Brent Garrett
- Carol A. Gefis
- Kieran D. Hartley
- Amber S. Healy
- Jonathan Judge
- David Kang
- Nate J. Kowalski
- Joshua N. Lange
- Catherine M. Lee
- Thomas A. Lenz
- David M. Lester
- Martin S. Li
- Mia A. Lomedico
- Jorge J. Luna
- Michael J. Morphew
- Ronald W. Novotny
- Michael J. O'Connor, Jr.
- Aaron V. O'Donnell
- Shawn M. Ogle
- Sharon J. Ormond
- Justin R. Peters
- Chesley D. Quaide
- Todd M. Robbins
- Irma Rodríguez Moisa
- Casandra P. Secord
- Jon M. Setoguchi
- Lauren B. Shelby
- Ann K. Smith
- Amber M. Solano
- Susana P. Solano
- Ethan G. Solove
- Susan M. Steward
- April Szabo
- Jay G. Trinnaman
- Jonathan S. Vick
- Robert L. Wenzel
- Brian M. Wheeler
- Glen A. Williams
- Kimberley A. Worley
- Lisa C. Zaradich
Archives
2021
2020
- December 2020
- October 2020
- August 2020
- July 2020
- June 2020
- May 2020
- April 2020
- March 2020
- January 2020
2019
- December 2019
- November 2019
- October 2019
- September 2019
- August 2019
- June 2019
- May 2019
- April 2019
- March 2019
- February 2019
2018
- December 2018
- November 2018
- October 2018
- September 2018
- August 2018
- July 2018
- June 2018
- May 2018
- March 2018
- February 2018
- January 2018
2017
- December 2017
- November 2017
- October 2017
- September 2017
- August 2017
- June 2017
- May 2017
- March 2017
- February 2017
2016
- December 2016
- November 2016
- October 2016
- September 2016
- August 2016
- July 2016
- June 2016
- May 2016
- April 2016
- March 2016
- February 2016
2015
- December 2015
- October 2015
- September 2015
- August 2015
- July 2015
- June 2015
- May 2015
- April 2015
- March 2015
- February 2015
- January 2015
2014
- November 2014
- October 2014
- September 2014
- August 2014
- July 2014
- June 2014
- May 2014
- April 2014
- February 2014
- January 2014
2013
- October 2013
- September 2013
- July 2013
- June 2013
- May 2013
- April 2013
- March 2013
- February 2013
- January 2013
2012
- October 2012
- September 2012
- August 2012
- July 2012
- June 2012
- May 2012
- April 2012
- March 2012
- February 2012
- January 2012
2011
- December 2011
- November 2011
- October 2011
- September 2011
- August 2011
- July 2011
- June 2011
- May 2011
- April 2011
- March 2011
- February 2011
- January 2011