On September 28, 2015, the Ninth Circuit ruled that an employee’s right to pursue representative claims under the Private Attorneys General Act (“PAGA”) cannot be waived through employment arbitration agreements. In Sakkab v. Luxottica Retail North America, Inc., the court in a divided 2-1 panel decision, weighed in for the first time on the scope of federal arbitration law applied to representatives acting under PAGA and agreed with the California Supreme Court, resolving a split among federal district courts in California.
PAGA was enacted in 2004 but it has only recently become a widely litigated claim. Under PAGA, employees are given the authority to sue their employer on behalf of themselves and other “aggrieved employees” for various violations of the Labor Code. In a PAGA action, the employee and his or her attorney litigate the case “on behalf of the state” to recover civil penalties. The penalties recoverable under PAGA must be paid 75% to the State and 25% to the aggrieved employees. Under PAGA, the employee’s attorney is entitled to recover their attorneys’ fees and costs.
In Sakkab, the plaintiff, a former employee at a Lenscrafter retail store, filed a class action complaint against Luxottica alleging wage and hour violations along with a claim under PAGA. Luxottica petitioned to compel arbitration based on the arbitration agreement between Sakkab and Luxottica which barred any collective, class or representative actions. In 2013, the district court granted Luxottica’s petition to compel arbitration on an individual basis and dismissed the action. Plaintiff appealed the district court’s ruling.
After the district court entered judgment in Sakkab, the California Supreme Court ruled in Iskanian v. CLS Transportation, 26 Cal.4th 348 (2014) that PAGA waivers are unenforceable under California law. The so-called “Iskanian rule” was met with mixed results in the federal district courts. Some district courts refused to follow the Iskanian rule, holding that a state law ban on enforcement of arbitration agreements was contrary to federal arbitration law and the United States Supreme Court’s decision in AT&T Mobility LLC v. Concepcion, 563 U.S. 333 (2011) while, other federal district courts in California followed the Iskanian rule.
In a notably scathing dissent, Judge N. Randy Smith argued that the majority has “ignored” Concepcion and improperly “upholds a ‘judicially created’ state rule” which clearly frustrates the purpose of the Federal Arbitration Act (“FAA”). Judge Smith concluded that the court should have deferred to the “FAA’s ‘liberal federal policy favoring arbitration’…rather than circumventing it” and should have held that the Iskanian rule is preempted by the FAA.
With a slim majority and strongly worded dissent in Sakkab, the Ninth Circuit resolved the conflict among the district courts in California and avoided a collision with the California Supreme Court. However, en banc review of the panel decision before the entire Ninth Circuit is likely, and therefore last week’s ruling may not be the last word on this issue. Also, two related appeals remain pending before the Ninth Circuit, Sierra v. Oakley Sales Corp., case number 13-55891 and Hopkins v. BCI Coca-Cola Bottling Company of Los Angeles, case number 13-56126.
Neither Sakkab nor Iskanian directly addressed the issue of whether an employee can be required to arbitrate a representative PAGA claim or if employees are entitled to a judicial forum in a PAGA lawsuit.
As a result of this decision, employers are likely to see more PAGA cases headed their way. Employers can preemptively avoid or minimize the risk of a costly PAGA lawsuit through routine audits of their wage and hour policies and practices. This process should include a review of any employment related arbitration agreements that are being utilized to ensure that they comply with various legal requirements proscribed by California and federal law.
- Partner
Jonathan Judge heads the Private Labor and Employment Group’s Advice and Counsel Team of attorneys. He represents clients, large and small, in employment advice and counsel matters including wage and hour, leaves of absence, and ...
Other AALRR Blogs
Recent Posts
- Update on the California Health Care Minimum Wage
- Resources for California Employers to Track and Confirm Their State and Local Minimum Wage Requirements
- 11 Local Minimum Wage Ordinances Poised to Increase on July 1, 2024
- Fast Food Restaurants -- Be Prepared for a DIR Audit
- U.S. Supreme Court Lowers Bar for Proving Discrimination Claims
- Governor Signs Urgency Legislation Exempting Certain Restaurants from New Fast Food Minimum Wage
- Sexual Violence and Harassment Prevention Training for Janitorial Service Providers Goes Into Effect
- California Supreme Court Strips Trial Court’s Authority to Dismiss Unwieldy PAGA Actions
- California Expands Employee Paid Sick Leave Entitlements Effective January 1, 2024
- California Employers Beware! Arbitration is Waived if Your Payment is Late (Yes, Even by a Day)
Popular Categories
- (153)
- (52)
- (42)
- (37)
- (6)
- (36)
- (23)
- (15)
- (15)
- (24)
- (6)
- (7)
- (6)
- (6)
- (9)
- (6)
- (4)
- (2)
- (3)
- (2)
- (2)
- (2)
- (2)
- (3)
- (3)
- (1)
- (1)
- (2)
- (1)
- (1)
- (1)
- (1)
- (1)
- (1)
- (1)
- (1)
Contributors
- Cindy Strom Arellano
- Sarkis A. Atoyan
- Eddy R. Beltran
- William M. Betley
- Brigham M. Cheney
- Michele L. Collender
- Kevin R. Dale
- Scott K. Dauscher
- Alexandria M. Davidson
- William A. Diedrich
- Paul S. Fleck
- Lauren S. Gafa
- L. Brent Garrett
- Evan J. Gautier
- Carol A. Gefis
- Jennifer S. Grock
- Jonathan Judge
- David Kang
- Nate J. Kowalski
- Joshua N. Lange
- Catherine M. Lee
- Thomas A. Lenz
- David M. Lester
- Martin S. Li
- Jorge J. Luna
- Brian D. Martin
- Ronald W. Novotny
- Michael J. O'Connor, Jr.
- Aaron V. O'Donnell
- Shawn M. Ogle
- Sharon J. Ormond
- Joseph E. Pelochino
- Chesley D. Quaide
- Todd M. Robbins
- Irma Rodríguez Moisa
- Saba Salamatian
- Casandra P. Secord
- Jon M. Setoguchi
- Ann K. Smith
- Amber M. Solano
- Susana P. Solano
- Susan M. Steward
- April Szabo
- Jay G. Trinnaman
- Jonathan S. Vick
- Robert L. Wenzel
- Brian M. Wheeler
- Glen A. Williams
Archives
2024
2023
2022
- November 2022
- October 2022
- September 2022
- July 2022
- June 2022
- May 2022
- April 2022
- March 2022
- February 2022
- January 2022
2021
- November 2021
- October 2021
- September 2021
- July 2021
- June 2021
- May 2021
- April 2021
- March 2021
- February 2021
- January 2021
2020
- December 2020
- October 2020
- August 2020
- July 2020
- June 2020
- May 2020
- April 2020
- March 2020
- January 2020
2019
- December 2019
- November 2019
- October 2019
- September 2019
- August 2019
- June 2019
- May 2019
- April 2019
- March 2019
- February 2019
2018
- December 2018
- November 2018
- October 2018
- September 2018
- August 2018
- July 2018
- June 2018
- May 2018
- March 2018
- February 2018
- January 2018
2017
- December 2017
- November 2017
- October 2017
- September 2017
- August 2017
- June 2017
- May 2017
- March 2017
- February 2017
2016
- December 2016
- November 2016
- October 2016
- September 2016
- August 2016
- July 2016
- June 2016
- May 2016
- April 2016
- March 2016
- February 2016
2015
- December 2015
- October 2015
- September 2015
- August 2015
- July 2015
- June 2015
- May 2015
- April 2015
- March 2015
- February 2015
- January 2015
2014
- November 2014
- October 2014
- September 2014
- August 2014
- July 2014
- June 2014
- May 2014
- April 2014
- February 2014
- January 2014
2013
- October 2013
- September 2013
- July 2013
- June 2013
- May 2013
- April 2013
- March 2013
- February 2013
- January 2013
2012
- October 2012
- September 2012
- August 2012
- July 2012
- June 2012
- May 2012
- April 2012
- March 2012
- February 2012
- January 2012
2011
- December 2011
- November 2011
- October 2011
- September 2011
- August 2011
- July 2011
- June 2011
- May 2011
- April 2011
- March 2011
- February 2011
- January 2011