On August 18, 2020, the Sonoma County Board of Supervisors enacted an emergency ordinance to establish supplemental Paid Sick Leave (“PSL”) requirements for private employers with employees who work in its unincorporated areas. The Paid Sick Leave Ordinance (“PSLO”) became operative immediately upon enactment and will run concurrently with the federal Families First Coronavirus Response Act (“FFCRA”), expiring on December 31, 2020; however, the PSLO would be automatically extended by any extension of the provisions of the FFCRA.
Like the requirements of the FFCRA and similar supplemental PSL ordinances issued around California, the PSL required by the PSLO is in addition to any PSL or other leave a qualifying employee was already entitled to under the law or through existing employer policies (i.e., accrued vacation, sick leave and/or paid time off). Employees cannot be required to use their existing leave time before using the supplemental PSL.
Who Is Covered?
Employees: Covered employees include any individual, regardless of immigration status, employed by a qualifying employer and who has worked for the employer for more than two (2) hours within the geographic boundaries of unincorporated Sonoma County. (The PSLO, like the City of Santa Rosa’s recent ordinance, is silent on when these two hours must have been worked to qualify.)
Employers: The PSLO applies only to employers with 500 or more employees nationally. It does not apply to any government employer. It does not apply to employers that are already subject to the federal FFCRA – i.e., those with fewer than 500 employees.
Notably, unlike most other recently enacted PSL ordinances, private sector employers of health care providers and emergency responders in unincorporated Sonoma County are required to furnish the supplemental PSL to those providers or responders in certain situations, detailed below.
Supplemental Paid Sick Leave Requirements
- Calculation of Supplemental Paid Sick Leave Hours
Full-Time Employees: A fulltime employee (scheduled to work 40 or more hours per week) is entitled to up to eighty (80) hours of supplemental PSL.
Part-Time Employees: A part-time employee (scheduled to work fewer than 40 hours per week) is entitled to supplemental PSL hours equal to no greater than the employee’s average number of work hours in a two-week period, calculated over the past six (6) months.
The employee must be compensated for sick leave time at no less than the employee’s regular rate of pay not to exceed $511 per day and not to exceed $5,110 in the aggregate, regardless of the reason for the leave.
Notably, employees of joint employers are only entitled to the total aggregate amount of supplemental PSL specified for employees of one of the employers.
2. Reasons Supplemental Paid Sick Leave May Be Used
An employee can use paid sick leave if they cannot work or telework for any of the following reasons:
- The employee has been advised by a health care provider to isolate or self-quarantine to prevent the spread of COVID-19.
- The employee is subject to quarantine or isolation by federal, state or local order due to COVID-19.
- The employee is experiencing COVID-19 symptoms and is seeking a medical diagnosis.
- The employee needs to care for an individual who is subject to a federal, state, or local quarantine or isolation order related to COVID19, or has been advised by a health care provider to self-quarantine related to COVID-19, or is experiencing COVID 19 symptoms and is seeking a medical diagnosis.
- The employee takes time off work because the employee needs to provide care for an individual whose senior care provider or whose school or childcare provider is closed or is unavailable in response to a public health or other public official’s recommendation.
Health care providers and first responders employed by non-governmental employers are entitled to the supplemental PSL for use for reasons (a)-(d), above, regardless of whether the leave creates a hardship on the employer. However, while the PSL benefits are available to health care providers and first responders for reason (e), the employer is permitted to deny some or all of such a leave request if the employer makes a good faith determination that the leave would create a staffing shortfall creating operational hardship.
Other Important Information
- Employers are required to provide notice to employees of the benefits provided by the PSLO by posting a notice in the workplace in both English and Spanish, on any intranet or application-based platform, or via email.
- Employers may only take reasonable measures to confirm an employee’s eligibility for Supplemental PSL, in accordance with the limitations set forth in the FFCRA or in the applicable regulations.
- Employers may require employees to identify the basis for which the employee is requesting leave but cannot require employees to furnish a doctor's note or other supporting documentation.
- Employers are prohibited from requiring employees to find or confirm a replacement as a condition of taking leave under the PSLO.
- Employers are not required to cash out any the unused Supplemental PSL benefits to employees at the time of separation.
- The supplemental PSL obligation created by the PSLO is deemed satisfied if an employee already has at least 80 hours of accrued PSL benefits as of August 18, 2020, or at least 160 hours of total accrued leave benefits (PSL plus vacation, etc.).
- The PSLO includes a strict anti-retaliation provision and entitles aggrieved employees to pursue a civil action for reinstatement, back pay, withheld leave benefits, and attorneys’ fees.
EMPLOYERS MUST REMAIN DILIGENT
The landscape of local supplemental PSL ordinances in California is still developing, so employers must pay particular attention to the specifics of the provisions applicable to their employees based upon the numbers of workers employed, and the jurisdiction(s) where these employees work. This is particularly important for ordinances such as the PSLO that covers employees who may also have spent time working within the boundaries of the City of Santa Rosa, which enacted its own ordinance recently. Employers should consult their legal counsel as needed to ensure they remain compliant with all applicable laws.
This AALRR post is intended for informational purposes only and should not be relied upon in reaching a conclusion in a particular area of law. Applicability of the legal principles discussed may differ substantially in individual situations. Receipt of this or any other AALRR post does not create an attorney-client relationship. The Firm is not responsible for inadvertent errors that may occur in the publishing process.
© 2020 Atkinson, Andelson, Loya, Ruud & Romo
- Of Counsel
Glen Williams has counseled and represented business management in all manner of employment matters including investigations and litigation of claims of discrimination, sexual harassment and wrongful termination, as well as ...
- Partner
Jonathan Judge heads the Private Labor and Employment Group’s Advice and Counsel Team of attorneys. He represents clients, large and small, in employment advice and counsel matters including wage and hour, leaves of absence, and ...
Other AALRR Blogs
Recent Posts
- An Early Holiday Present For Employers Facing Out Of Control Plaintiff Attorney Greed
- California’s Minimum Wage to Increase to $16.50 Per Hour January 1, 2025
- New San Diego County Fair Chance Ordinance Restricts Employers’ Use of Criminal History
- New Los Angeles County Fair Chance Ordinance Restricts Employers’ Use of Criminal History
- Legislation Impacting California Employee Handbook Policies for 2025
- Update on the California Health Care Minimum Wage
- Resources for California Employers to Track and Confirm Their State and Local Minimum Wage Requirements
- 11 Local Minimum Wage Ordinances Poised to Increase on July 1, 2024
- Fast Food Restaurants -- Be Prepared for a DIR Audit
- U.S. Supreme Court Lowers Bar for Proving Discrimination Claims
Popular Categories
- (37)
- (156)
- (54)
- (39)
- (25)
- (7)
- (42)
- (23)
- (15)
- (15)
- (6)
- (7)
- (6)
- (6)
- (9)
- (6)
- (4)
- (2)
- (3)
- (2)
- (2)
- (2)
- (2)
- (3)
- (3)
- (1)
- (1)
- (2)
- (1)
- (1)
- (1)
- (1)
- (1)
- (1)
- (1)
- (1)
Contributors
- Cindy Strom Arellano
- Sarkis A. Atoyan
- Eddy R. Beltran
- William M. Betley
- Brigham M. Cheney
- Michele L. Collender
- Kevin R. Dale
- Scott K. Dauscher
- Alexandria M. Davidson
- William A. Diedrich
- Paul S. Fleck
- Lauren S. Gafa
- L. Brent Garrett
- Evan J. Gautier
- Carol A. Gefis
- Jennifer S. Grock
- Jonathan Judge
- David Kang
- Nate J. Kowalski
- Joshua N. Lange
- Catherine M. Lee
- Thomas A. Lenz
- David M. Lester
- Martin S. Li
- Jorge J. Luna
- Brian D. Martin
- Ronald W. Novotny
- Michael J. O'Connor, Jr.
- Aaron V. O'Donnell
- Shawn M. Ogle
- Sharon J. Ormond
- Nora Pasin
- Joseph E. Pelochino
- Chesley D. Quaide
- Todd M. Robbins
- Irma Rodríguez Moisa
- Saba Salamatian
- Casandra P. Secord
- Jon M. Setoguchi
- Ann K. Smith
- Amber M. Solano
- Susana P. Solano
- Susan M. Steward
- April Szabo
- Jay G. Trinnaman
- Jonathan S. Vick
- Robert L. Wenzel
- Brian M. Wheeler
- Glen A. Williams
Archives
2024
2023
2022
- November 2022
- October 2022
- September 2022
- July 2022
- June 2022
- May 2022
- April 2022
- March 2022
- February 2022
- January 2022
2021
- November 2021
- October 2021
- September 2021
- July 2021
- June 2021
- May 2021
- April 2021
- March 2021
- February 2021
- January 2021
2020
- December 2020
- October 2020
- August 2020
- July 2020
- June 2020
- May 2020
- April 2020
- March 2020
- January 2020
2019
- December 2019
- November 2019
- October 2019
- September 2019
- August 2019
- June 2019
- May 2019
- April 2019
- March 2019
- February 2019
2018
- December 2018
- November 2018
- October 2018
- September 2018
- August 2018
- July 2018
- June 2018
- May 2018
- March 2018
- February 2018
- January 2018
2017
- December 2017
- November 2017
- October 2017
- September 2017
- August 2017
- June 2017
- May 2017
- March 2017
- February 2017
2016
- December 2016
- November 2016
- October 2016
- September 2016
- August 2016
- July 2016
- June 2016
- May 2016
- April 2016
- March 2016
- February 2016
2015
- December 2015
- October 2015
- September 2015
- August 2015
- July 2015
- June 2015
- May 2015
- April 2015
- March 2015
- February 2015
- January 2015
2014
- November 2014
- October 2014
- September 2014
- August 2014
- July 2014
- June 2014
- May 2014
- April 2014
- February 2014
- January 2014
2013
- October 2013
- September 2013
- July 2013
- June 2013
- May 2013
- April 2013
- March 2013
- February 2013
- January 2013
2012
- October 2012
- September 2012
- August 2012
- July 2012
- June 2012
- May 2012
- April 2012
- March 2012
- February 2012
- January 2012
2011
- December 2011
- November 2011
- October 2011
- September 2011
- August 2011
- July 2011
- June 2011
- May 2011
- April 2011
- March 2011
- February 2011
- January 2011