The City of Long Beach, California enacted a new supplemental paid sick leave ordinance on May 19, 2020, which is effective immediately. The ordinance applies to employers with 500 or more employees nationally and excludes those who are required to provide paid sick leave benefits under the federal Families First Coronavirus Response Act.
Employees who are employed by a covered employer and who perform any work in Long Beach are eligible to receive the supplemental paid sick leave provided by the ordinance. However, the determination of employee status in the construction industry will be made in accordance with California Labor Code section 245.5(a)(2).
Employees may use the leave for any of the following reasons, unless they can work from home and are healthy enough to do so:
- The employee takes time off due to COVID-19 infection or because a public health official or healthcare provider requires or recommends the employee isolate or self-quarantine to prevent the spread of COVID-19, or because the employee is caring for someone who is quarantined or isolated due to COVID-19;
- The employee takes time off work because the employee is advised by a health-care provider to self-quarantine due to COVID-19 or is caring for someone who is so advised;
- The employee takes time off work because the employee experiences symptoms of COVID-19 and is seeking a medical diagnosis; or
- The employee takes time off work because the employee needs to provide care for a minor child whose school, daycare, or child care provider is closed or unavailable because of COVID-19 and the employee is unable to secure a reasonable alternative caregiver.
Employers can require employees to provide reasonable notice of their intent to use leave, but only for foreseeable absences. Employers can require employees to identify the basis for requesting leave but cannot require a doctor’s note or other medical documentation to justify an absence.
Employers must provide 80 leave hours to full-time employees. The ordinance also requires employers to provide part-time employees with leave in an amount equal to the number of hours the employee works, on average, over a two-week period, to be determined by calculating the daily average of hours during the six-month period preceding May 19. Employers may offset sick leave hours by previously provided time off with pay, so long as the time off was provided to an employee on or after March 4, 2020, and the employees could use for the time off reasons the ordinance requires or in response to an employee’s inability to work due to COVID-19.
The supplemental paid sick leave must be paid at the employee’s regular rate of pay, but may be paid at two-thirds of the employee’s regular rate if it is used to care for another person. The maximum value of the paid sick leave is $511 per day or a total of $5,110, and $200 per day (or a total of $2,000) for caregiver leave.
Employers with a paid leave or paid time off policy providing a minimum of 160 hours of annual paid leave are exempt from the obligation to provide supplemental paid sick leave under the ordinance. The ordinance also provides that the supplemental paid sick leave is in addition to pre-existing paid leave benefits, and that employees need not exhaust sick leave or other leave that they have before using the supplemental paid sick leave hours. In addition, employers are prohibited from changing any of their paid time off policies after May 19 other than to increase the amount of paid leave that is available.
The ordinance sets forth an exemption for certain collective bargaining agreements under the following conditions:
- If a collective bargaining agreement (CBA) in place on the effective date of the ordinance contains COVID-19 related sick leave provisions.
- When a CBA expires or is otherwise open for renegotiation, the provisions of the ordinance may only be expressly waived if the waiver is explicitly set forth in the CBA in clear and unambiguous terms.
- If a CBA is in place on the effective date of this ordinance, but the CBA does not address COVID-19 related sick leave provisions, an employer must comply with the ordinance.
Employers may not retaliate against employees for using or requesting supplemental paid sick leave, cannot require employees to find a replacement as a condition to approving leave, and cannot require an employee to waive the provisions of the ordinance other than through a CBA as set forth above.
Employees may file a private right of action in Superior Court to enforce the ordinance. Prevailing employees may be awarded reinstatement, actual and punitive damages, attorneys’ fees and costs, and any other legal or equitable relief that the court deems appropriate in such actions.
The ordinance has no set expiration date, and the City Council will decide when the ordinance will end after receiving reports from the City Manager and Mayor every 90 days.
This AALRR presentation is intended for informational purposes only and should not be relied upon in reaching a conclusion in a particular area of law. Applicability of the legal principles discussed may differ substantially in individual situations. Receipt of this or any other AALRR presentation/publication does not create an attorney-client relationship. The firm is not responsible for inadvertent errors that may occur in the publishing process.
© 2020 Atkinson, Andelson, Loya, Ruud & Romo
- Of Counsel
Ronald Novotny has been representing employers in labor and employment matters in federal and state courts and administrative agencies in California since 1981. He has extensive experience involving union and employer unfair ...
- Partner
Jonathan Judge heads the Private Labor and Employment Group’s Advice and Counsel Team of attorneys. He represents clients, large and small, in employment advice and counsel matters including wage and hour, leaves of absence, and ...
Other AALRR Blogs
Recent Posts
- California’s Minimum Wage to Increase to $16.50 Per Hour January 1, 2025
- New San Diego County Fair Chance Ordinance Restricts Employers’ Use of Criminal History
- New Los Angeles County Fair Chance Ordinance Restricts Employers’ Use of Criminal History
- Legislation Impacting California Employee Handbook Policies for 2025
- Update on the California Health Care Minimum Wage
- Resources for California Employers to Track and Confirm Their State and Local Minimum Wage Requirements
- 11 Local Minimum Wage Ordinances Poised to Increase on July 1, 2024
- Fast Food Restaurants -- Be Prepared for a DIR Audit
- U.S. Supreme Court Lowers Bar for Proving Discrimination Claims
- Governor Signs Urgency Legislation Exempting Certain Restaurants from New Fast Food Minimum Wage
Popular Categories
- (54)
- (156)
- (39)
- (25)
- (7)
- (42)
- (36)
- (23)
- (15)
- (15)
- (6)
- (7)
- (6)
- (6)
- (9)
- (6)
- (4)
- (2)
- (3)
- (2)
- (2)
- (2)
- (2)
- (3)
- (3)
- (1)
- (1)
- (2)
- (1)
- (1)
- (1)
- (1)
- (1)
- (1)
- (1)
- (1)
Contributors
- Cindy Strom Arellano
- Sarkis A. Atoyan
- Eddy R. Beltran
- William M. Betley
- Brigham M. Cheney
- Michele L. Collender
- Kevin R. Dale
- Scott K. Dauscher
- Alexandria M. Davidson
- William A. Diedrich
- Paul S. Fleck
- Lauren S. Gafa
- L. Brent Garrett
- Evan J. Gautier
- Carol A. Gefis
- Jennifer S. Grock
- Jonathan Judge
- David Kang
- Nate J. Kowalski
- Joshua N. Lange
- Catherine M. Lee
- Thomas A. Lenz
- David M. Lester
- Martin S. Li
- Jorge J. Luna
- Brian D. Martin
- Ronald W. Novotny
- Michael J. O'Connor, Jr.
- Aaron V. O'Donnell
- Shawn M. Ogle
- Sharon J. Ormond
- Nora Pasin
- Joseph E. Pelochino
- Chesley D. Quaide
- Todd M. Robbins
- Irma Rodríguez Moisa
- Saba Salamatian
- Casandra P. Secord
- Jon M. Setoguchi
- Ann K. Smith
- Amber M. Solano
- Susana P. Solano
- Susan M. Steward
- April Szabo
- Jay G. Trinnaman
- Jonathan S. Vick
- Robert L. Wenzel
- Brian M. Wheeler
- Glen A. Williams
Archives
2024
2023
2022
- November 2022
- October 2022
- September 2022
- July 2022
- June 2022
- May 2022
- April 2022
- March 2022
- February 2022
- January 2022
2021
- November 2021
- October 2021
- September 2021
- July 2021
- June 2021
- May 2021
- April 2021
- March 2021
- February 2021
- January 2021
2020
- December 2020
- October 2020
- August 2020
- July 2020
- June 2020
- May 2020
- April 2020
- March 2020
- January 2020
2019
- December 2019
- November 2019
- October 2019
- September 2019
- August 2019
- June 2019
- May 2019
- April 2019
- March 2019
- February 2019
2018
- December 2018
- November 2018
- October 2018
- September 2018
- August 2018
- July 2018
- June 2018
- May 2018
- March 2018
- February 2018
- January 2018
2017
- December 2017
- November 2017
- October 2017
- September 2017
- August 2017
- June 2017
- May 2017
- March 2017
- February 2017
2016
- December 2016
- November 2016
- October 2016
- September 2016
- August 2016
- July 2016
- June 2016
- May 2016
- April 2016
- March 2016
- February 2016
2015
- December 2015
- October 2015
- September 2015
- August 2015
- July 2015
- June 2015
- May 2015
- April 2015
- March 2015
- February 2015
- January 2015
2014
- November 2014
- October 2014
- September 2014
- August 2014
- July 2014
- June 2014
- May 2014
- April 2014
- February 2014
- January 2014
2013
- October 2013
- September 2013
- July 2013
- June 2013
- May 2013
- April 2013
- March 2013
- February 2013
- January 2013
2012
- October 2012
- September 2012
- August 2012
- July 2012
- June 2012
- May 2012
- April 2012
- March 2012
- February 2012
- January 2012
2011
- December 2011
- November 2011
- October 2011
- September 2011
- August 2011
- July 2011
- June 2011
- May 2011
- April 2011
- March 2011
- February 2011
- January 2011