As we previously reported here, the National Labor Relations Board has recently filed complaints against a number of employers alleging the employers unlawfully terminated or disciplined employees who posted on social media websites, such as Facebook, statements critical of their working conditions. In one press release, the NLRB states such discussions were "protected concerted activity within the meaning of Section 7 of the National Labor Relations Act, because it involved a conversation among coworkers about their terms and conditions of employment, including their job performance and staffing levels."
In a recent case against Hispanics Untied of Buffalo (HUB), an administrative law judge hearing the NLRB's complaint, in a ruling the NLRB described as "the first of its kind," ordered HUB to reinstate five employees who HUB terminated after the employees posted on Facebook statements critical of their working conditions. HUB is a nonprofit organization that provides social services to disadvantaged clients. Comments posted on Facebook in response to a Facebook posting by a co-worker regarding another co-worker's criticism of her work performance reportedly include, among others the following inflammatory statements:
I think we should give our paychecks to our clients so they can 'pay' the rent, also we can take them to their Dr's appts, and served as translators (oh! We do that). Also we can clean their houses, we can go to DSS for them and we can run all their errands and they can spend their day in their house watching tv, and also we can go to do their grocery ship and organized the food in their house pantries . . . (insert ignore sarcasm here now).
The administrative law judge ruled the terminations violated Section 8(a)(a) of the National Labor Relations Act because the administrative law judge found that the employees' Facebook postings amounted to "protected concerted activity. Section 7 of the NLRA states "employees shall have the right to self-organization, to form, joint, or assist labor organizations, to bargain collectively through representation of their own choosing and to engage in other concerted activities for the purpose of collective bargaining or other mutual aid or protection. . ."
As we previously observed, employers should be aware that both the NLRA and the California Labor Code generally prohibit discipline of or discrimination against employees for disclosing to others the amount of their wages or information about the employees' working conditions. In light of those prohibitions and in light of the recent enforcement activity by the NLRB, employers should consult with experienced employment and labor law counsel when considering discipline of employees on account of communications related to or potentially related to employees' wages, hours, and/or working conditions.
- Partner
Christopher Andre is a seasoned civil litigator who focuses his practice on civil litigation and advising and representing employers. Mr. Andre is an editor of and frequent contributor to the firm’s Labor and Employment Law ...
- Partner
Scott Dauscher is Chair of the firm’s Commercial and Complex Litigation Practice Group. He also serves as Chair of the firm’s Class Action Defense Group, managing AALRR’s extensive class action practice and its team of ...
Other AALRR Blogs
Recent Posts
- Amendments to West Hollywood’s Minimum Wage and Paid Leave Ordinance Take Effect July 1
- Supreme Court Lowers the Bar for Plaintiffs to Establish Waiver of Right to Arbitrate Due to Employer’s Delayed Motion to Compel Arbitration
- Fair Credit Reporting Act Compliance: New California Court Opinion Clarifies the Stand-alone Disclosure Requirement
- Tax Implications - Employee Use of Employer-Provided Vehicles for Personal Commuting
- The Return to Work: What Employers Need to Know About California’s “Right to Recall” Law
- California’s Department of Industrial Relations Issues the 2022 Supplemental Paid Sick Leave Model Notice and Frequently Asked Questions
- U.S. Supreme Court Stays Federal OSHA’s Large Employer COVID-19 Vaccine and Testing Mandate; CMS Mandate Upheld
- All I Want for Christmas Is My Two Vaccines
- California’s SB 331: New Restrictions on Employee Separation Agreements and Non-Disparagement and Confidentiality Provisions
- Awaiting Federal Guidance on Vaccine Mandate, California Employers Must Look to Cal/OSHA for the Final Word
Popular Categories
- (45)
- (143)
- (31)
- (1)
- (41)
- (33)
- (6)
- (24)
- (4)
- (7)
- (22)
- (14)
- (2)
- (6)
- (14)
- (2)
- (6)
- (9)
- (4)
- (2)
- (3)
- (2)
- (2)
- (1)
- (3)
- (3)
- (1)
- (1)
- (1)
- (2)
- (1)
- (1)
- (1)
- (1)
- (1)
- (1)
Contributors
- Christopher S. Andre
- Cindy Strom Arellano
- Sarkis A. Atoyan
- Alicia A. Belock
- Eddy R. Beltran
- Rex Darrell Berry
- William M. Betley
- Brigham M. Cheney
- Michele L. Collender
- Kevin R. Dale
- Scott K. Dauscher
- Alexandria M. Davidson
- William A. Diedrich
- Lauren D. Fierro
- Paul S. Fleck
- Lauren S. Gafa
- L. Brent Garrett
- Evan J. Gautier
- Daniel C. Gavilanes
- Carol A. Gefis
- Jennifer S. Grock
- Kieran D. Hartley
- Amber S. Healy
- Jonathan Judge
- David Kang
- Nate J. Kowalski
- Iris L. Kristoff
- Geoff D. La Val
- Joshua N. Lange
- Catherine M. Lee
- Thomas A. Lenz
- David M. Lester
- Martin S. Li
- Mia A. Lomedico
- Jorge J. Luna
- Brian D. Martin
- Ronald W. Novotny
- Michael J. O'Connor, Jr.
- Aaron V. O'Donnell
- Shawn M. Ogle
- Sharon J. Ormond
- Joseph E. Pelochino
- Chesley D. Quaide
- Todd M. Robbins
- Irma Rodríguez Moisa
- Casandra P. Secord
- Christina C.K. Semmer
- Jon M. Setoguchi
- Ann K. Smith
- Amber M. Solano
- Susana P. Solano
- Susan M. Steward
- April Szabo
- Jay G. Trinnaman
- Jonathan S. Vick
- Robert L. Wenzel
- Brian M. Wheeler
- Glen A. Williams
- Kimberley A. Worley
Archives
2022
2021
- November 2021
- October 2021
- September 2021
- July 2021
- June 2021
- May 2021
- April 2021
- March 2021
- February 2021
- January 2021
2020
- December 2020
- October 2020
- August 2020
- July 2020
- June 2020
- May 2020
- April 2020
- March 2020
- January 2020
2019
- December 2019
- November 2019
- October 2019
- September 2019
- August 2019
- June 2019
- May 2019
- April 2019
- March 2019
- February 2019
2018
- December 2018
- November 2018
- October 2018
- September 2018
- August 2018
- July 2018
- June 2018
- May 2018
- March 2018
- February 2018
- January 2018
2017
- December 2017
- November 2017
- October 2017
- September 2017
- August 2017
- June 2017
- May 2017
- March 2017
- February 2017
2016
- December 2016
- November 2016
- October 2016
- September 2016
- August 2016
- July 2016
- June 2016
- May 2016
- April 2016
- March 2016
- February 2016
2015
- December 2015
- October 2015
- September 2015
- August 2015
- July 2015
- June 2015
- May 2015
- April 2015
- March 2015
- February 2015
- January 2015
2014
- November 2014
- October 2014
- September 2014
- August 2014
- July 2014
- June 2014
- May 2014
- April 2014
- February 2014
- January 2014
2013
- October 2013
- September 2013
- July 2013
- June 2013
- May 2013
- April 2013
- March 2013
- February 2013
- January 2013
2012
- October 2012
- September 2012
- August 2012
- July 2012
- June 2012
- May 2012
- April 2012
- March 2012
- February 2012
- January 2012
2011
- December 2011
- November 2011
- October 2011
- September 2011
- August 2011
- July 2011
- June 2011
- May 2011
- April 2011
- March 2011
- February 2011
- January 2011