On January 31, 2020, the U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services (USCIS), which operates under the Department of Homeland Security (DHS), announced and made available a new version of Form I-9 (Rev. 10/21/2019), Employment Eligibility Verification. Employers may begin using the new form as of January 31, 2020 but must use this form exclusively no later than May 1, 2020 for all new employees or where any reverification applies. The previous version, which has a revision date of “Rev. 07/17/2017 N,” will be invalid as of April 30, 2020. After April 30, 2020, employers who fail to use the new Form I-9 may be subject to penalties under the Immigration and Nationality Act.
The new Form I-9 is available here www.uscis.gov/i-9. Employers may order paper Forms I-9 at www.uscis.gov/forms/forms-by-mail.
Background
Employers are required to properly complete Form I-9 for each individual they hire for employment in the U.S. An employer who fails to ensure proper completion and retention of Forms I-9 may be subject to monetary penalties and, in some cases, criminal penalties. Employers must maintain Forms I-9 during the employment and after termination for three years after the date of hire or one year after the date the employment ended, whichever is later.
Employers must make Forms I-9 available for inspection upon request by officers of the DHS, the Immigrant and Employee Rights Section of the Department of Justice’s Civil Rights Division, and the Department of Labor. Violations associated with Forms I-9 are typically uncovered following a DHS worksite raid, audit, or random inspection.
Employers must ensure that all pages of the Form I-9 instructions and List of Acceptable Documents are available, electronically or in print, to all employees completing Forms I-9.
Exceptions to the Requirement to Complete and Maintain Forms I-9
Employers are not required to complete Form I-9 for:
- Causal domestic service employees working in a private household when the work is sporadic, irregular or intermittent;
- Independent contractors for whom the employer does not set work hours or provide tools to do the job; or
- Employees working outside the United States.
Employers should speak to their employment law counsel for assistance in determining whether a worker is truly an independent contractor.
What has Changed on Form I-9?
USCIS added Eswatini and North Macedonia to the County of Issuance field in Section 1 and the foreign passport issuing authority field in Section 2 per those countries’ recent name changes. This change is only viewable on the online fillable version of Form I-9. This is the only change to the form itself. The remaining changes are found in the form instructions.
In the Form I-9 instructions, USCIS clarified who can act as an authorized representative on behalf of an employer. Specifically, the employer may designate any person as an authorized representative to act of its behalf to complete Section 2. This makes remote hiring more feasible. However, the employer is liable for any violations committed by the person designated by the employer in connection with the completion of the Form I-9 or the verification process.
USCIS updated the DHS Privacy Notice to employees, which is included in the form instructions. The major change to the Privacy Notice is the notification that Form I-9 may be made available for inspection, and that DHS may also share the information on the form, as appropriate, for law enforcement purposes or in the interest of national security.
USCIS also updated its website address and provided minor acceptable document clarifications in the form instructions. The new instructions indicate that the List C Employment Authorization Document issued by DHS (List C, item 7) “does not include the Employment Authorization Document (Form I-766)” from List A. USCIS also added a new instruction noting that the List B, “ID card issued by federal, state, or local government agencies or entities, listed as B2,” does not include the “Driver’s license or ID card issued by a State or outlying possession of the United States” described in B1 of the List of Acceptable Documents.”
As a reminder, employers cannot specify which documents the employee may present to establish employment authorization. The employer must allow the employee to choose from the List of Acceptable Documents.
Employers Should Not Complete the New Form-I-9 for Most Current Employees
Employers should not complete the new Form I-9 (Rev. 10/21/2019) for current employees who already have a properly completed Form I-9 on file, unless reverification applies. Performing unnecessary verifications could result in unfair documentary practices or violation of the Immigration and Nationality Act’s anti-discrimination provision. California employers who engage in unnecessary reverifications may violate California Labor Code section 1019.2, which prohibits unfair immigration-related practices, including reverifying the employment eligibility of a current employee at a time or in a manner not required by specified federal law. A violation under Labor Code section 1019.2 is subject to a maximum penalty of $10,000 per violation.
Please contact the authors or your employment law counsel at AALRR for any questions regarding Form I-9.
These AALRR publications are intended for informational purposes only and should not be relied upon in reaching a conclusion in a particular area of law. Applicability of the legal principles discussed may differ substantially in individual situations. Receipt of this or any other AALRR presentation/publication does not create an attorney-client relationship. The Firm is not responsible for inadvertent errors that may occur in the publishing process.
©2020 Atkinson, Andelson, Loya, Ruud & Romo
- Partner
Susana Solano advises employers and management regarding issues arising out of the employee-employer relationship, including the prevention of employment discrimination, retaliation, harassment, wrongful termination, and ...
- Partner
Susan Steward provides expert representation to every client she serves, both as counsel and in the courtroom. Ms. Steward has worked closely with for-profit and nonprofit companies, governmental entities, trade associations ...
Other AALRR Blogs
Recent Posts
- An Early Holiday Present For Employers Facing Out Of Control Plaintiff Attorney Greed
- California’s Minimum Wage to Increase to $16.50 Per Hour January 1, 2025
- New San Diego County Fair Chance Ordinance Restricts Employers’ Use of Criminal History
- New Los Angeles County Fair Chance Ordinance Restricts Employers’ Use of Criminal History
- Legislation Impacting California Employee Handbook Policies for 2025
- Update on the California Health Care Minimum Wage
- Resources for California Employers to Track and Confirm Their State and Local Minimum Wage Requirements
- 11 Local Minimum Wage Ordinances Poised to Increase on July 1, 2024
- Fast Food Restaurants -- Be Prepared for a DIR Audit
- U.S. Supreme Court Lowers Bar for Proving Discrimination Claims
Popular Categories
- (37)
- (156)
- (54)
- (39)
- (25)
- (7)
- (42)
- (23)
- (15)
- (15)
- (6)
- (7)
- (6)
- (6)
- (9)
- (6)
- (4)
- (2)
- (3)
- (2)
- (2)
- (2)
- (2)
- (3)
- (3)
- (1)
- (1)
- (2)
- (1)
- (1)
- (1)
- (1)
- (1)
- (1)
- (1)
- (1)
Contributors
- Cindy Strom Arellano
- Sarkis A. Atoyan
- Eddy R. Beltran
- William M. Betley
- Brigham M. Cheney
- Michele L. Collender
- Kevin R. Dale
- Scott K. Dauscher
- Alexandria M. Davidson
- William A. Diedrich
- Paul S. Fleck
- Lauren S. Gafa
- L. Brent Garrett
- Evan J. Gautier
- Carol A. Gefis
- Jennifer S. Grock
- Jonathan Judge
- David Kang
- Nate J. Kowalski
- Joshua N. Lange
- Catherine M. Lee
- Thomas A. Lenz
- David M. Lester
- Martin S. Li
- Jorge J. Luna
- Brian D. Martin
- Ronald W. Novotny
- Michael J. O'Connor, Jr.
- Aaron V. O'Donnell
- Shawn M. Ogle
- Sharon J. Ormond
- Nora Pasin
- Joseph E. Pelochino
- Chesley D. Quaide
- Todd M. Robbins
- Irma Rodríguez Moisa
- Saba Salamatian
- Casandra P. Secord
- Jon M. Setoguchi
- Ann K. Smith
- Amber M. Solano
- Susana P. Solano
- Susan M. Steward
- April Szabo
- Jay G. Trinnaman
- Jonathan S. Vick
- Robert L. Wenzel
- Brian M. Wheeler
- Glen A. Williams
Archives
2024
2023
2022
- November 2022
- October 2022
- September 2022
- July 2022
- June 2022
- May 2022
- April 2022
- March 2022
- February 2022
- January 2022
2021
- November 2021
- October 2021
- September 2021
- July 2021
- June 2021
- May 2021
- April 2021
- March 2021
- February 2021
- January 2021
2020
- December 2020
- October 2020
- August 2020
- July 2020
- June 2020
- May 2020
- April 2020
- March 2020
- January 2020
2019
- December 2019
- November 2019
- October 2019
- September 2019
- August 2019
- June 2019
- May 2019
- April 2019
- March 2019
- February 2019
2018
- December 2018
- November 2018
- October 2018
- September 2018
- August 2018
- July 2018
- June 2018
- May 2018
- March 2018
- February 2018
- January 2018
2017
- December 2017
- November 2017
- October 2017
- September 2017
- August 2017
- June 2017
- May 2017
- March 2017
- February 2017
2016
- December 2016
- November 2016
- October 2016
- September 2016
- August 2016
- July 2016
- June 2016
- May 2016
- April 2016
- March 2016
- February 2016
2015
- December 2015
- October 2015
- September 2015
- August 2015
- July 2015
- June 2015
- May 2015
- April 2015
- March 2015
- February 2015
- January 2015
2014
- November 2014
- October 2014
- September 2014
- August 2014
- July 2014
- June 2014
- May 2014
- April 2014
- February 2014
- January 2014
2013
- October 2013
- September 2013
- July 2013
- June 2013
- May 2013
- April 2013
- March 2013
- February 2013
- January 2013
2012
- October 2012
- September 2012
- August 2012
- July 2012
- June 2012
- May 2012
- April 2012
- March 2012
- February 2012
- January 2012
2011
- December 2011
- November 2011
- October 2011
- September 2011
- August 2011
- July 2011
- June 2011
- May 2011
- April 2011
- March 2011
- February 2011
- January 2011