Effective October 10, 2024, San Diego County adopted its new Fair Chance Ordinance (“SDFCO”). The SDFCO imposes additional restrictions that covered employers must follow regarding the use of criminal history in employment, on top of what California law already requires.
The new SDFCO applies to employers that do business in the unincorporated areas of the County of San Diego and have 5 or more employees. Applicants and current employees who are in or are seeking a position involving at least 2 hours of work, including remote work, on average each week in the unincorporated areas of the County, receive protections under the SDFCO. Unlike the California state Fair Chance Act (“FCO”), the SDFCO expressly defines an “applicant” to include those applying for employment but also current employees seeking promotions or transfers.
As has been widely reported, companies throughout the country are facing pandemic-related labor shortages, including because of workers’ childcare obligations, concerns about returning to in-person work, and the continuation of unemployment benefits. Employers attempting to address this labor shortage are offering hiring bonuses, increasing wages, and improving benefits and flexibility. It also appears they are hiring teenagers to fill these vacancies, which coincides with the general uptick in youth employment between April and July each year. According to the U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics (“BLS”), the unemployment rate among teenagers this month stands at 12.3% and is anticipated to fall further, providing a stark contrast to teen unemployment last summer. (In July 2020, the unemployment rate for 16 to 24 year olds was 18.5%, about twice as high as the year before, according to the BLS.)
One of the many downsides to the current pandemic is that so many people have exhausted their family leave taking care of themselves as well as sick family members. The non-COVID-19-related issues of families have not gone away, however. Who is taking parents to chemo treatments? Who is taking spouses to physical therapy? How do employees and employers deal with these issues? If family leave is no longer an option, employees may turn to associational discrimination and reasonable accommodation of associational discrimination if they are denied time off to take care of family members.
If this sounds like an oxymoron to you, join the crowd. For years, California employers have relied on the principle that plaintiffs cannot prevail under Government Code section 12940(k) for “failure to prevent” discrimination (or harassment or retaliation) if the plaintiff does not prevail on the underlying claim. The failure to prevent cause of action has been viewed as a derivative cause of action that stems exclusively from a finding that discrimination, harassment or retaliation actually occurred. Carter v. California Dept. of Veterans Affairs (2006) 38 Cal. 4th 914, 925, fn. 4. The Carter rule has been used as a successful tool for employers when filing motions for summary judgment and eliminates “failure to prevent” tag-a-long claims when the underlying law is not broken.
In the recent case of Huerta v. Kava Holdings, Inc., 2018 WL 5999639 (Cal. Ct. App. Nov. 14, 2018), the California Court of Appeal held that a prevailing employer that made a section 998 settlement offer to the plaintiff in an action brought under the Fair Employment and Housing Act (“FEHA”) was not entitled to costs and expert witness fees incurred after the plaintiff’s rejection of the offer.
Employers who are faced with sexual harassment or sexual abuse claims by a current or former employee now have another problem to consider – are the settlement payment and related attorney’s fees incurred in settling the claim deductible? Unfortunately, the answer to that question may now be no.
Beginning January 1, 2018, California employers are required to display the “Transgender Rights in the Workplace” poster created by the Department of Fair Employment and Housing (“DFEH”). Employers must place the poster in a prominent and accessible location in the workplace.
The DFEH published on its website the mandatory poster, which is available in English ...
What kinds of provisions in arbitration agreements will cause the courts to invalidate them? The Court of Appeal in the recent case of Baxter v. Genworth North America Corporation analyzed and rejected several of them, in upholding the denial of a motion to compel arbitration of an employee’s wrongful termination and discrimination claims. Baxter v. Genworth North America (October 26, 2017 ...
When can an employer be liable for failing to prevent a sexual assault or rape of an employee? The California Court of Appeal in the recent case of M.F. v. Pacific Pearl Hotel Management, LLC (D070150, FOURTH APPELLATE DISTRICT, DIVISION ONE, 10/26/17), helped provide some answers to this question.
The plaintiff in the case worked as a housekeeper in a five-building hotel property. One morning, the hotel’s ...
On August 29, 2017, the Office of Management and Budget (OMB) informed the Equal Employment Opportunity Commission (EEOC) that it is suspending implementation of the EEO-1 form that was revised on September 29, 2016, in accordance with the OMB’s authority under the Paperwork Reduction Act (PRA). This means that employers will not be required to report salary information with the EEO-1 Report due on March 31, 2018.
Other AALRR Blogs
Recent Posts
- California Court of Appeal Upholds Revocable, Prospective Meal Period Waivers
- SPRING CLEANING: Have You “Cleaned Up” Your Arbitration Agreement?
- What One Court Takes Away In Attorneys’ Fees Other Courts Give Back
- California Court Finds Employers Cannot Contract Around the “Ending Forced Arbitration of Sexual Assault and Sexual Harassment Act” With Choice-of-Law Provision
- Love In The Workplace? Embrace It!
- The DLSE Issues Guidance For Employers Regarding California Wildfires
- California Court of Appeal Puts End to Attempted “Headless” PAGA Actions
- How Can One Detect AI In Documents And Should We Care?
- California Court Enforces Arbitration Agreement, Confirms Plaintiff-Employees Can’t Have Their (Joint Employment) Cake and Eat It Too
- An Early Holiday Present For Employers Facing Out Of Control Plaintiff Attorney Greed
Popular Categories
- (49)
- (33)
- (128)
- (37)
- (34)
- (4)
- (15)
- (17)
- (6)
- (7)
- (15)
- (13)
- (1)
- (9)
- (3)
- (3)
- (2)
- (2)
- (2)
- (3)
- (3)
- (1)
- (2)
- (1)
- (2)
- (1)
- (1)
- (1)
- (1)
- (1)
- (1)
- (1)
- (1)
Contributors
- Cindy Strom Arellano
- Sarkis A. Atoyan
- William M. Betley
- Michele L. Collender
- Kevin R. Dale
- Scott K. Dauscher
- Alexandria M. Davidson
- William A. Diedrich
- Paul S. Fleck
- Lauren S. Gafa
- Priscilla Gamino
- L. Brent Garrett
- Evan J. Gautier
- Carol A. Gefis
- Jennifer S. Grock
- Jonathan Judge
- Nate J. Kowalski
- Joshua N. Lange
- Catherine M. Lee
- Thomas A. Lenz
- David M. Lester
- Martin S. Li
- Jorge J. Luna
- Brian D. Martin
- Ronald W. Novotny
- Michael J. O'Connor, Jr.
- Aaron V. O'Donnell
- Shawn M. Ogle
- Sharon J. Ormond
- Nora Pasin
- Joseph E. Pelochino
- Chesley D. Quaide
- Todd M. Robbins
- Irma Rodríguez Moisa
- Saba Salamatian
- Casandra P. Secord
- Jon M. Setoguchi
- Ann K. Smith
- Amber M. Solano
- Susan M. Steward
- April Szabo
- Jay G. Trinnaman
- Jonathan S. Vick
- Robert L. Wenzel
- Glen A. Williams
Archives
2025
2024
2023
2022
- November 2022
- October 2022
- September 2022
- July 2022
- June 2022
- May 2022
- April 2022
- March 2022
- February 2022
- January 2022
2021
- November 2021
- October 2021
- September 2021
- July 2021
- June 2021
- May 2021
- April 2021
- March 2021
- February 2021
- January 2021
2018
- December 2018
- November 2018
- October 2018
- September 2018
- August 2018
- July 2018
- June 2018
- May 2018
- March 2018
- February 2018
- January 2018
2017
- December 2017
- November 2017
- October 2017
- September 2017
- August 2017
- June 2017
- May 2017
- March 2017
- February 2017
2016
- December 2016
- November 2016
- October 2016
- September 2016
- August 2016
- July 2016
- June 2016
- May 2016
- April 2016
- March 2016
- February 2016
2015
- December 2015
- October 2015
- September 2015
- August 2015
- July 2015
- June 2015
- May 2015
- April 2015
- March 2015
- February 2015
- January 2015
2014
- November 2014
- October 2014
- September 2014
- August 2014
- July 2014
- June 2014
- May 2014
- April 2014
- February 2014
- January 2014
2013
- October 2013
- September 2013
- July 2013
- June 2013
- May 2013
- April 2013
- March 2013
- February 2013
- January 2013
2012
- October 2012
- September 2012
- August 2012
- July 2012
- June 2012
- May 2012
- April 2012
- March 2012
- February 2012
- January 2012
2011
- December 2011
- November 2011
- October 2011
- September 2011
- August 2011
- July 2011
- June 2011
- May 2011
- April 2011
- March 2011
- February 2011
- January 2011