On February 10, 2015, the California Court of Appeal held that Industrial Welfare Commission (“IWC”) Wage Order 5 conflicts with California Labor Code section 512(a), and that the IWC exceeded its authority by creating an additional exception for second meal period waivers for health care workers. (Gerard v. Orange Coast Memorial Medical Center, 2015 WL 535730 (2015)).
Background
Plaintiff Jazmina Gerard (“Gerard”) and two other employees worked for defendant Orange Coast Memorial Medical Center (“Orange Coast”). Gerard usually worked a 12-hour shift, but from time-to-time worked in excess of 12 hours. Orange Coast permitted its employees who worked shifts in excess of 10 hours to voluntarily waive one of their meal periods, even if their shifts lasted more than 12 hours.
Gerard alleged she signed second meal period waivers and occasionally worked shifts in excess of 12 hours without being provided a second meal period. Gerard brought suit against Orange Coast, alleging Orange Coast’s second meal period waiver policy violated the California Labor Code. Gerard sought statutory penalties, unpaid wages, and injunctive relief, on behalf of herself and all other similarly situated employees.
Orange Coast contended its meal break policy was consistent with IWC Wage Order 5 and moved for summary judgment on Gerard’s claims and denial of class certification. The trial court found Orange Coast provided Gerard meal periods as required by law, granted summary judgment for Orange Coast, and denied class certification. Gerard appealed.
Conflict between Wage Order 5 and the Labor Code
The Court of Appeal addressed the apparent conflict between Wage Order 5 and Labor Code section 512(a). Wage Order 5 permits health care employees to waive their second meal period, even when they work in excess of 12 hours in a shift: “[E]mployees in the health care industry who work shifts in excess of eight (8) total hours in a workday may voluntarily waive their right to one of their two meal periods.”
Labor Code section 512(a), by contrast, allows waiver of the second meal period only when the employee works less than 12 hours in a shift:
An employer may not employ an employee for a work period of more than 10 hours per day without providing the employee with a second meal period of not less than 30 minutes, except that if the total hours worked is no more than 12 hours, the second meal period may be waived by mutual consent of the employer and the employee only if the first meal period was not waived.
Labor Code section 516 authorizes the IWC to adopt or amend working condition orders with respect to meal periods, “[e]xcept as provided in [Labor Code] Section 512.”
Gerard contended that Wage Order 5 is partially invalid because it conflicts with Labor Code section 512(a) and creates an additional exception for health care workers beyond what is authorized by the Labor Code. Gerard contended the IWC exceeded its authority by creating the additional exception.
Orange Coast, by contrast, contended that:
- The legislative history of Labor Code sections 512(a) and 516 supports the IWC’s creation of the additional meal period exception for health care workers;
- Wage Order 5 was issued before Labor Code section 516 was enacted, and therefore controls the determination of the legality of the additional exception;
- Wage Order 5 is “final and conclusive for all purposes” and forecloses judicial consideration of whether the IWC acted within the scope of its authority by promulgating Wage Order 5; and
- The waiver of the second meal period was valid under the California Supreme Court’s landmark decision in Brinker v. Superior Court.
The Court’s Analysis
The court rejected each of Orange Coast’s contentions. The court stated that there is a conflict between the plain language of Wage Order 5 and Labor Code section 512(a). Although the IWC was empowered to adopt requirements beyond those codified in statute, Labor Code section 516 was intended to limit that power with respect to the meal period requirements set forth in Labor Code section 512(a). The California Legislature, the court reasoned, amended Labor Code section 516 with the intent to prohibit the IWC from amending its wage orders in ways that conflict with the meal period requirements set forth in Labor Code section 512(a).
The court then rejected Orange Coast’s contention that Wage Order 5, rather than Labor Code section 516, controls the determination of the legality of the additional meal period exception. The court reasoned that even though Wage Order 5 was promulgated prior to the date on which Labor Code section 516 was amended, Wage Order 5 did not become effective until after Labor Code section 516 became effective. Thus, the court reasoned, Wage Order 5 is subject to the amended version of Labor Code section 516. Further, although IWC Wage Orders are to be accorded “extraordinary deference,” nothing within the text of the Labor Code suggests the Legislature intended to foreclose judicial consideration of whether the IWC acted within the scope of its authority in promulgating the Wage Orders.
The court then rejected Orange Coast’s contention that the Brinker decision confirmed the validity of second meal period waivers on shifts longer than 12 hours, pointing out that Brinker did not discuss the issue.
Retroactivity of the Court’s Decision
The court also addressed whether its decision invalidating section 11(D) of Wage Order 5 should be given retroactive effect. The court cited the general rule that judicial decisions are given retroactive effect, but also expressed reluctance to punish Orange Coast for conduct apparently excepted from penalties under Wage Order 5. Regardless, the court held that because the hour of additional pay under Labor Code section 226.7 constitutes a wage and not a penalty, the court’s decision had to be given retroactive effect with respect to Orange Coast’s liability (if any) for such damages. With respect to other potential liability, such as penalties under California's Private Attorneys General Act, the court remanded to the trial court for additional consideration.
Effect on Employers
Employers should review their policies and practices in light of this decision, which invalidates second meal period waivers for shifts of more than 12 hours in the health care industry.
It is worth noting that the five-member IWC, appointed by the Governor, was de-funded effective July 1, 2004 and is no longer in operation. In the IWC’s absence, the Wage Orders are being administered and enforced by the Division of Labor Standards Enforcement.
The IWC promulgated the Wage Orders for specific industries through a public drafting and hearing process. Without funding, the IWC processes for issuing revised or new Wage Orders are not available as they have been in the past. This is one reason the focus has shifted to the courts to challenge the existing Wage Orders.
Other AALRR Blogs
Recent Posts
- California’s Minimum Wage to Increase to $16.50 Per Hour January 1, 2025
- New San Diego County Fair Chance Ordinance Restricts Employers’ Use of Criminal History
- New Los Angeles County Fair Chance Ordinance Restricts Employers’ Use of Criminal History
- Legislation Impacting California Employee Handbook Policies for 2025
- Update on the California Health Care Minimum Wage
- Resources for California Employers to Track and Confirm Their State and Local Minimum Wage Requirements
- 11 Local Minimum Wage Ordinances Poised to Increase on July 1, 2024
- Fast Food Restaurants -- Be Prepared for a DIR Audit
- U.S. Supreme Court Lowers Bar for Proving Discrimination Claims
- Governor Signs Urgency Legislation Exempting Certain Restaurants from New Fast Food Minimum Wage
Popular Categories
- (54)
- (156)
- (39)
- (25)
- (7)
- (42)
- (36)
- (23)
- (15)
- (15)
- (6)
- (7)
- (6)
- (6)
- (9)
- (6)
- (4)
- (2)
- (3)
- (2)
- (2)
- (2)
- (2)
- (3)
- (3)
- (1)
- (1)
- (2)
- (1)
- (1)
- (1)
- (1)
- (1)
- (1)
- (1)
- (1)
Contributors
- Cindy Strom Arellano
- Sarkis A. Atoyan
- Eddy R. Beltran
- William M. Betley
- Brigham M. Cheney
- Michele L. Collender
- Kevin R. Dale
- Scott K. Dauscher
- Alexandria M. Davidson
- William A. Diedrich
- Paul S. Fleck
- Lauren S. Gafa
- L. Brent Garrett
- Evan J. Gautier
- Carol A. Gefis
- Jennifer S. Grock
- Jonathan Judge
- David Kang
- Nate J. Kowalski
- Joshua N. Lange
- Catherine M. Lee
- Thomas A. Lenz
- David M. Lester
- Martin S. Li
- Jorge J. Luna
- Brian D. Martin
- Ronald W. Novotny
- Michael J. O'Connor, Jr.
- Aaron V. O'Donnell
- Shawn M. Ogle
- Sharon J. Ormond
- Nora Pasin
- Joseph E. Pelochino
- Chesley D. Quaide
- Todd M. Robbins
- Irma Rodríguez Moisa
- Saba Salamatian
- Casandra P. Secord
- Jon M. Setoguchi
- Ann K. Smith
- Amber M. Solano
- Susana P. Solano
- Susan M. Steward
- April Szabo
- Jay G. Trinnaman
- Jonathan S. Vick
- Robert L. Wenzel
- Brian M. Wheeler
- Glen A. Williams
Archives
2024
2023
2022
- November 2022
- October 2022
- September 2022
- July 2022
- June 2022
- May 2022
- April 2022
- March 2022
- February 2022
- January 2022
2021
- November 2021
- October 2021
- September 2021
- July 2021
- June 2021
- May 2021
- April 2021
- March 2021
- February 2021
- January 2021
2020
- December 2020
- October 2020
- August 2020
- July 2020
- June 2020
- May 2020
- April 2020
- March 2020
- January 2020
2019
- December 2019
- November 2019
- October 2019
- September 2019
- August 2019
- June 2019
- May 2019
- April 2019
- March 2019
- February 2019
2018
- December 2018
- November 2018
- October 2018
- September 2018
- August 2018
- July 2018
- June 2018
- May 2018
- March 2018
- February 2018
- January 2018
2017
- December 2017
- November 2017
- October 2017
- September 2017
- August 2017
- June 2017
- May 2017
- March 2017
- February 2017
2016
- December 2016
- November 2016
- October 2016
- September 2016
- August 2016
- July 2016
- June 2016
- May 2016
- April 2016
- March 2016
- February 2016
2015
- December 2015
- October 2015
- September 2015
- August 2015
- July 2015
- June 2015
- May 2015
- April 2015
- March 2015
- February 2015
- January 2015
2014
- November 2014
- October 2014
- September 2014
- August 2014
- July 2014
- June 2014
- May 2014
- April 2014
- February 2014
- January 2014
2013
- October 2013
- September 2013
- July 2013
- June 2013
- May 2013
- April 2013
- March 2013
- February 2013
- January 2013
2012
- October 2012
- September 2012
- August 2012
- July 2012
- June 2012
- May 2012
- April 2012
- March 2012
- February 2012
- January 2012
2011
- December 2011
- November 2011
- October 2011
- September 2011
- August 2011
- July 2011
- June 2011
- May 2011
- April 2011
- March 2011
- February 2011
- January 2011