On January 21, 2015, the California Court of Appeal held that the City of Santa Monica (the “City”) did not fail to reasonably accommodate an employee, Tony Nealy, where Nealy was unable to perform the essential functions of the job and there were no alternate positions for which Nealy was qualified. Nealy v. City of Santa Monica, (California Ct App 02/13/2015). The court also found that the City did not have to grant an indefinite leave while Nealy waited for a position to open up for which he could qualify, and that the termination did not constitute retaliation.
Nealy began working for the City in 1996. While serving as a solid waste equipment operator, Nealy injured his right knee. Eventually, Nealy returned to work with several work restrictions. In August 2006, Nealy injured his lower back while on duty. His doctor declared him temporary totally disabled for a few weeks and then cleared him to return to work to do “light duty, semi-sedentary office work,” and if such work was not available, Nealy was to be considered temporary totally disabled. The City did not have any semi-sedentary office work available for Nealy so he remained off work.
In December 2008, the City and Nealy held an accommodation meeting where Nealy asked to return to the solid waste equipment operator position despite his work restrictions. In response to Nealy’s request, the City hired a third-party to perform an essential job function analysis for the position. The City discussed the analysis and the work restrictions with Nealy and advised Nealy that the City could not reasonably accommodate him in his desired position because of Nealy’s inability to perform several of the essential functions of the job. The City and Nealy considered other options such as vacant alternative positions. However, there were no vacant positions for which Nealy qualified that also accommodated his work restrictions. Thereafter, the City notified Nealy that it was unable to provide him with reasonable accommodation and completed his employer-generated CalPERS disability retirement application.
Nealy filed a complaint against the City under the Fair Employment and Housing Act (“FEHA”) for disability discrimination, failure to provide reasonable accommodation, failure to engage in the interactive process, and retaliation. In its summary judgment motion, the City argued that (i) Nealy could not perform the essential functions of a solid waste equipment operator; (ii) Nealy was not a “qualified individual” within the meaning of FEHA; and (iii) Nealy did not engage in a “protected activity” for purposes of his retaliation claim.
The court concluded that the City had identified several essential functions that Nealy could not perform given his medical restrictions. The court criticized Nealy’s failure to address all of the City’s points and held that “the fact that one essential function may be up for debate does not preclude summary judgment if the employee cannot perform other essential functions even with accommodation.”
The court also held that eliminating essential functions was unreasonable as a matter of law; therefore, the City was not required to eliminate duties to suit Nealy’s medical restrictions.
Furthermore, the court held that Nealy failed to establish that qualifying alternative positions existed at the time of the interactive process. It held that FEHA does not require the employer to provide an indefinite leave of absence to await possible future vacancies.
Finally, the court held that Nealy’s exercise of the rights to request a reasonable accommodation and to engage in the interactive process did not constitute protected activity for a FEHA retaliation claim.
What This Means for Employers
The case confirms several well-established principles associated with disability discrimination claims, including that all essential job functions should be identified as part of the reasonable accommodation evaluation (ideally beforehand in a job description); that an employer is not required to eliminate essential functions as a reasonable accommodation; and that an employer need not provide an indefinite leave while waiting for a vacant position to become available. The case also articulates, for the first time, that an employee’s exercise of his right to request a reasonable accommodation and to engage in the interactive process does not qualify as protected activity to support a retaliation claim.
- Partner
Jorge Luna has been practicing law since 1996 in a variety of areas, including employment, construction, business litigation, intellectual property and entertainment. For the past 17 years, Mr. Luna has focused his practice ...
- Partner
Jonathan Judge heads the Private Labor and Employment Group’s Advice and Counsel Team of attorneys. He represents clients, large and small, in employment advice and counsel matters including wage and hour, leaves of absence, and ...
Other AALRR Blogs
Recent Posts
- California’s Minimum Wage to Increase to $16.50 Per Hour January 1, 2025
- New San Diego County Fair Chance Ordinance Restricts Employers’ Use of Criminal History
- New Los Angeles County Fair Chance Ordinance Restricts Employers’ Use of Criminal History
- Legislation Impacting California Employee Handbook Policies for 2025
- Update on the California Health Care Minimum Wage
- Resources for California Employers to Track and Confirm Their State and Local Minimum Wage Requirements
- 11 Local Minimum Wage Ordinances Poised to Increase on July 1, 2024
- Fast Food Restaurants -- Be Prepared for a DIR Audit
- U.S. Supreme Court Lowers Bar for Proving Discrimination Claims
- Governor Signs Urgency Legislation Exempting Certain Restaurants from New Fast Food Minimum Wage
Popular Categories
- (54)
- (156)
- (39)
- (7)
- (25)
- (42)
- (36)
- (23)
- (15)
- (15)
- (6)
- (7)
- (6)
- (6)
- (9)
- (6)
- (4)
- (2)
- (3)
- (2)
- (2)
- (2)
- (2)
- (3)
- (3)
- (1)
- (1)
- (2)
- (1)
- (1)
- (1)
- (1)
- (1)
- (1)
- (1)
- (1)
Contributors
- Cindy Strom Arellano
- Sarkis A. Atoyan
- Eddy R. Beltran
- William M. Betley
- Brigham M. Cheney
- Michele L. Collender
- Kevin R. Dale
- Scott K. Dauscher
- Alexandria M. Davidson
- William A. Diedrich
- Paul S. Fleck
- Lauren S. Gafa
- L. Brent Garrett
- Evan J. Gautier
- Carol A. Gefis
- Jennifer S. Grock
- Jonathan Judge
- David Kang
- Nate J. Kowalski
- Joshua N. Lange
- Catherine M. Lee
- Thomas A. Lenz
- David M. Lester
- Martin S. Li
- Jorge J. Luna
- Brian D. Martin
- Ronald W. Novotny
- Michael J. O'Connor, Jr.
- Aaron V. O'Donnell
- Shawn M. Ogle
- Sharon J. Ormond
- Nora Pasin
- Joseph E. Pelochino
- Chesley D. Quaide
- Todd M. Robbins
- Irma Rodríguez Moisa
- Saba Salamatian
- Casandra P. Secord
- Jon M. Setoguchi
- Ann K. Smith
- Amber M. Solano
- Susana P. Solano
- Susan M. Steward
- April Szabo
- Jay G. Trinnaman
- Jonathan S. Vick
- Robert L. Wenzel
- Brian M. Wheeler
- Glen A. Williams
Archives
2024
2023
2022
- November 2022
- October 2022
- September 2022
- July 2022
- June 2022
- May 2022
- April 2022
- March 2022
- February 2022
- January 2022
2021
- November 2021
- October 2021
- September 2021
- July 2021
- June 2021
- May 2021
- April 2021
- March 2021
- February 2021
- January 2021
2020
- December 2020
- October 2020
- August 2020
- July 2020
- June 2020
- May 2020
- April 2020
- March 2020
- January 2020
2019
- December 2019
- November 2019
- October 2019
- September 2019
- August 2019
- June 2019
- May 2019
- April 2019
- March 2019
- February 2019
2018
- December 2018
- November 2018
- October 2018
- September 2018
- August 2018
- July 2018
- June 2018
- May 2018
- March 2018
- February 2018
- January 2018
2017
- December 2017
- November 2017
- October 2017
- September 2017
- August 2017
- June 2017
- May 2017
- March 2017
- February 2017
2016
- December 2016
- November 2016
- October 2016
- September 2016
- August 2016
- July 2016
- June 2016
- May 2016
- April 2016
- March 2016
- February 2016
2015
- December 2015
- October 2015
- September 2015
- August 2015
- July 2015
- June 2015
- May 2015
- April 2015
- March 2015
- February 2015
- January 2015
2014
- November 2014
- October 2014
- September 2014
- August 2014
- July 2014
- June 2014
- May 2014
- April 2014
- February 2014
- January 2014
2013
- October 2013
- September 2013
- July 2013
- June 2013
- May 2013
- April 2013
- March 2013
- February 2013
- January 2013
2012
- October 2012
- September 2012
- August 2012
- July 2012
- June 2012
- May 2012
- April 2012
- March 2012
- February 2012
- January 2012
2011
- December 2011
- November 2011
- October 2011
- September 2011
- August 2011
- July 2011
- June 2011
- May 2011
- April 2011
- March 2011
- February 2011
- January 2011