We recently discussed San Francisco’s efforts to stay On The Cutting Edge Of The Cutting Edge with regard to Paid Sick Leave, but now both San Francisco and San Jose have passed new employee leave ordinances setting the bar even higher.
On April 7, 2020, the San Francisco Board of Supervisors unanimously approved the Public Health Emergency Leave Ordinance (“PHELO”) requiring private employers with 500 or more employees to provide public health emergency leave consistent with the federal Families First Coronavirus Response Act (FFCRA), which was discussed in detail in our post, HR 6201: What Employers Need To Know. The emergency ordinance took effect April 17, 2020.
On the same day, the City of San Jose also voted to enact an emergency Paid Sick Leave Ordinance (“PSLO”) applying its provisions to those employers who were not required to provide paid sick leave under the FFCRA. This emergency ordinance took effect April 8, 2020.
Both cities clearly set their sights on certain gaps created by the recently enacted federal sick leave provisions in the FFCRA, which exempt employees of private-sector companies with more than 500 workers and potentially exempts those of businesses with fewer than 50 workers.
San Francisco’s PHELO
Employees covered by the PHELO include full-time, part-time, temporary, seasonal, salaried, and commissioned workers who have performed at least 56 hours of work within the San Francisco City and County’s geographic boundaries during the prior year.
The PHELO addresses the FFCRA’s coverage gap by establishing minimum requirements for private employers with more than 500 employees, subject to certain exclusions for healthcare providers, emergency responders and collectively bargained employees.
Pursuant to the PHELO, full-time employees are entitled to 80 hours of paid sick leave. Part-time employees are entitled to sick leave hours equal to the number of hours the employee worked on average over a two-week period.
The hours of emergency leave provided for under the PHELO is in addition to paid sick leave mandated by California law or San Francisco Ordinance. Notably, though, if an employer has already provided such additional paid leave since February 25, 2020 for COVID-19 related purposes (not including previously accrued hours), any hours will be offset against the 80-hour requirement (e.g., if an employee already used 16 hours of additional paid leave beyond that legally required, the employee is only entitled to 64 more hours).
Also, employers cannot require employees to use other accrued paid time off (paid sick leave, PTO, vacation, etc.) before they can use PHELO. However, employees may voluntarily choose to use other accrued paid leave before using PHELO.
PHELO may only be used if an employee is: (a) under a quarantine or isolation order; (b) under a health care provider’s order to self-quarantine; (c) experiencing symptoms of COVID-19 and seeking care; (d) caring for a family member under quarantine/isolation orders or experiencing symptoms; or (e) caring for a family member whose school or place of care has been closed or rendered unavailable.
PHELO will expire on June 17, 2020 unless reenacted by the Board of Supervisors, or upon the termination of the Public Health Emergency, whichever occurs first.
San Jose’s PSLO
San Jose’s PSLO also requires businesses exempt from the FFCRA to provide an immediate 80 hours of sick leave for employees who have performed at least two hours of work within the City’s boundaries and who continue to leave their residences to perform essential work, as defined by the Santa Clara County Public Health Officer’s Order. Thus, San Jose employers need not allow employees to use this leave if they are teleworking.
PSLO may only be used if an employee is: (a) under a quarantine or isolation order or caring for someone under a quarantine or isolation order; (b) under a health care provider’s order to self-quarantine or caring for such a person; (c) experiencing symptoms of COVID-19 and seeking care; or (d) caring for a minor child whose school or daycare has been closed.
The PSLO requires a covered employer to pay the employee for properly used sick leave at the employee’s regular rate of pay up to $511 a day not to exceed an aggregate of $5,110. If the employee is using sick time to care for another person, the employer need only pay the employee two-thirds of the regular rate of pay up to $200 a day not to exceed an aggregate of $2,000.
Employers Must Remain Diligent
As soon as they are signed into effect, these emergency city ordinances will require private employers who were exempted from providing emergency paid sick leave under the FFCRA to provide nearly identical paid leave to their employees who have worked in San Francisco or San Jose. Employers whose employees perform work in these jurisdictions should carefully evaluate the San Francisco PHELO and San Jose PSLO to ensure that policies and practices are in place for compliance.
State and local public entities continue to move the bar for employers throughout California with very little notice. Employers must continue to be diligent in monitoring this avalanche of developments and consulting AALRR counsel as needed to ensure they remain compliant with applicable law.
This AALRR publication is intended for informational purposes only and should not be relied upon in reaching a conclusion in a particular area of law. Applicability of the legal principles discussed may differ substantially in individual situations. Receipt of this or any other AALRR publication does not create an attorney-client relationship. The Firm is not responsible for inadvertent errors that may occur in the publishing process.
© 2020 Atkinson, Andelson, Loya, Ruud & Romo
- Of Counsel
Glen Williams has counseled and represented business management in all manner of employment matters including investigations and litigation of claims of discrimination, sexual harassment and wrongful termination, as well as ...
- Partner
Jonathan Judge heads the Private Labor and Employment Group’s Advice and Counsel Team of attorneys. He represents clients, large and small, in employment advice and counsel matters including wage and hour, leaves of absence, and ...
Other AALRR Blogs
Recent Posts
- An Early Holiday Present For Employers Facing Out Of Control Plaintiff Attorney Greed
- California’s Minimum Wage to Increase to $16.50 Per Hour January 1, 2025
- New San Diego County Fair Chance Ordinance Restricts Employers’ Use of Criminal History
- New Los Angeles County Fair Chance Ordinance Restricts Employers’ Use of Criminal History
- Legislation Impacting California Employee Handbook Policies for 2025
- Update on the California Health Care Minimum Wage
- Resources for California Employers to Track and Confirm Their State and Local Minimum Wage Requirements
- 11 Local Minimum Wage Ordinances Poised to Increase on July 1, 2024
- Fast Food Restaurants -- Be Prepared for a DIR Audit
- U.S. Supreme Court Lowers Bar for Proving Discrimination Claims
Popular Categories
- (37)
- (156)
- (54)
- (39)
- (25)
- (7)
- (42)
- (23)
- (15)
- (15)
- (6)
- (7)
- (6)
- (6)
- (9)
- (6)
- (4)
- (2)
- (3)
- (2)
- (2)
- (2)
- (2)
- (3)
- (3)
- (1)
- (1)
- (2)
- (1)
- (1)
- (1)
- (1)
- (1)
- (1)
- (1)
- (1)
Contributors
- Cindy Strom Arellano
- Sarkis A. Atoyan
- Eddy R. Beltran
- William M. Betley
- Brigham M. Cheney
- Michele L. Collender
- Kevin R. Dale
- Scott K. Dauscher
- Alexandria M. Davidson
- William A. Diedrich
- Paul S. Fleck
- Lauren S. Gafa
- L. Brent Garrett
- Evan J. Gautier
- Carol A. Gefis
- Jennifer S. Grock
- Jonathan Judge
- David Kang
- Nate J. Kowalski
- Joshua N. Lange
- Catherine M. Lee
- Thomas A. Lenz
- David M. Lester
- Martin S. Li
- Jorge J. Luna
- Brian D. Martin
- Ronald W. Novotny
- Michael J. O'Connor, Jr.
- Aaron V. O'Donnell
- Shawn M. Ogle
- Sharon J. Ormond
- Nora Pasin
- Joseph E. Pelochino
- Chesley D. Quaide
- Todd M. Robbins
- Irma Rodríguez Moisa
- Saba Salamatian
- Casandra P. Secord
- Jon M. Setoguchi
- Ann K. Smith
- Amber M. Solano
- Susana P. Solano
- Susan M. Steward
- April Szabo
- Jay G. Trinnaman
- Jonathan S. Vick
- Robert L. Wenzel
- Brian M. Wheeler
- Glen A. Williams
Archives
2024
2023
2022
- November 2022
- October 2022
- September 2022
- July 2022
- June 2022
- May 2022
- April 2022
- March 2022
- February 2022
- January 2022
2021
- November 2021
- October 2021
- September 2021
- July 2021
- June 2021
- May 2021
- April 2021
- March 2021
- February 2021
- January 2021
2020
- December 2020
- October 2020
- August 2020
- July 2020
- June 2020
- May 2020
- April 2020
- March 2020
- January 2020
2019
- December 2019
- November 2019
- October 2019
- September 2019
- August 2019
- June 2019
- May 2019
- April 2019
- March 2019
- February 2019
2018
- December 2018
- November 2018
- October 2018
- September 2018
- August 2018
- July 2018
- June 2018
- May 2018
- March 2018
- February 2018
- January 2018
2017
- December 2017
- November 2017
- October 2017
- September 2017
- August 2017
- June 2017
- May 2017
- March 2017
- February 2017
2016
- December 2016
- November 2016
- October 2016
- September 2016
- August 2016
- July 2016
- June 2016
- May 2016
- April 2016
- March 2016
- February 2016
2015
- December 2015
- October 2015
- September 2015
- August 2015
- July 2015
- June 2015
- May 2015
- April 2015
- March 2015
- February 2015
- January 2015
2014
- November 2014
- October 2014
- September 2014
- August 2014
- July 2014
- June 2014
- May 2014
- April 2014
- February 2014
- January 2014
2013
- October 2013
- September 2013
- July 2013
- June 2013
- May 2013
- April 2013
- March 2013
- February 2013
- January 2013
2012
- October 2012
- September 2012
- August 2012
- July 2012
- June 2012
- May 2012
- April 2012
- March 2012
- February 2012
- January 2012
2011
- December 2011
- November 2011
- October 2011
- September 2011
- August 2011
- July 2011
- June 2011
- May 2011
- April 2011
- March 2011
- February 2011
- January 2011