Congress enacted the Americans with Disabilities Act in 1990, at a time when the Internet had a relatively minor impact on the daily lives of Americans. Today, the Internet plays a critical role in personal, civic, educational, commercial, and professional life. Public agencies increasingly rely on the Internet as an efficient and comprehensive method of communicating with and providing services to constituents. Although many individuals with disabilities rely on the Internet as an essential tool, not all websites are designed to give persons with disabilities equal access to information and services online.
ADA regulations do not expressly address accessibility requirements for website and mobile applications; however, the United States Department of Justice (DOJ) takes the position that Title II of the ADA, which applies to state and local government programs, covers Internet website access. Public entities such as school districts, county offices of education, and community college districts should ensure their websites comply with accessibility guidelines.
Legal Requirements
Websites of state and local government entities are covered by Title II of the ADA. (See 28 C.F.R. § 35.102 [the Title II regulation “applies to all services, programs, and activities provided or made available by public entities”].) The DOJ also interprets Title III (public accommodations), and relies on several court decisions, to apply ADA accessibility requirements to websites of private businesses. (See, e.g., National Federation of the Blind v. Target Corp. (N.D. Cal. 2006) 452 F.Supp.2d 946, 953 [the first case in which any court ruled that the ADA applied to a retail website].)
In 2010, the DOJ issued an Advance Notice of Proposed Rulemaking indicating its intent to promulgate regulations under Title II and Title III of the ADA to address requirements for website accessibility. The notice indicated the DOJ would develop website accessibility rules “in the near future” and continue to enforce the website accessibility on a case-by-case basis. The proposed regulations have not materialized, and the DOJ has delayed its targeted release several times. In the absence of regulations, the DOJ relies on the Web Content Accessibility Guidelines (WCAG) 2.0 guidelines issued by the World Wide Web Consortium (W3C), an international organization that develops standards to ensure the long-term growth of the Internet. (Click here to see an overview of the Guidelines.) The DOJ pursues enforcement of website accessibility as part of its authority to conduct “compliance reviews” under the ADA.
In a recent DOJ settlement with four U.S. cities, investigations found each city’s online employment opportunities website was not fully accessible to people with disabilities. Under the settlement agreement, each city agreed to ensure its hiring policies and procedures do not discriminate against any applicant on the basis of disability, including by: “ensuring that its online employment opportunities website and job applications conform with the Web Content Accessibility Guidelines 2.0, which are industry guidelines for making web content accessible.” (More information on the settlement can be found here.) In settlements with private companies, the DOJ likewise required company websites and mobile applications to conform to the WCAG 2.0 guidelines.
WCAG 2.0 Guidelines for Website Accessibility
The DOJ recognizes the WCAG 2.0 guidelines as the industry standard for web content accessibility and is expected to adopt these guidelines as the web accessibility standards in its forthcoming regulations. As ADA regulations do not directly address website accessibility, the WCAG 2.0 guidelines provide the best guidance for educational agencies to ensure their websites comply with the ADA.
The WCAG 2.0 guidelines are based on four principles of accessible online content: perceivable, operable, understandable, and robust. The guidelines address each principle, and Success Criteria under each guideline describe specifically what must be achieved to conform to the standard. The 12 guidelines are:
- Perceivable
1.1 Provide text alternatives for any non-text content so that it can be changed into other forms people need, such as large print, braille, speech, symbols or simpler language.
1.2 Provide alternatives for time-based media.
1.3 Create content that can be presented in different ways (for example simpler layout) without losing information or structure.
1.4 Make it easier for users to see and hear content including separating foreground from background.
- Operable
2.1 Make all functionality available from a keyboard.
2.2 Provide users enough time to read and use content.
2.3 Do not design content in a way that is known to cause seizures.
2.4 Provide ways to help users navigate, find content, and determine where they are.
- Understandable
3.1 Make text content readable and understandable.
3.2 Make Web pages appear and operate in predictable ways.
3.3 Help users avoid and correct mistakes.
- Robust
4.1 Maximize compatibility with current and future user agents, including assistive technologies.
Until DOJ regulations are available, educational agencies should consider taking all possible steps to make their websites accessible. By implementing the WCAG 2.0 guidelines to the extent possible, public agencies with web presence can ensure equal access for users with disabilities.
Other AALRR Blogs
Recent Posts
- Are You Ready for AB 2534? Our AB 2534 Toolkit Is Here to Help
- Don't Start from Scratch: Our AI Policy Toolkit Has Your District Covered
- Slurs and Epithets in the College Classroom: Are they protected speech?
- AALRR’s 2024 Title IX Virtual Academy
- Unmasking Deepfakes: Legal Insights for School Districts
- How to Address Employees’ Use of Social Media
- How far is too far? Searching Students’ Homes and Remote Test Proctoring
- Making Cybersecurity a Priority
- U.S. Department of Education Issues Proposed Amendments to Title IX Regulations
- Inadvertent Disability Discrimination May Lurk in Hiring Software, Artificial Intelligence and Algorithms
Popular Categories
- (55)
- (12)
- (81)
- (96)
- (43)
- (53)
- (22)
- (40)
- (11)
- (22)
- (6)
- (4)
- (3)
- (2)
- (3)
- (2)
- (4)
- (1)
- (1)
- (1)
- (1)
- (1)
- (1)
- (1)
Contributors
- Steven J. Andelson
- Ernest L. Bell
- Matthew T. Besmer
- William M. Betley
- Mark R. Bresee
- W. Bryce Chastain
- J. Kayleigh Chevrier
- Andreas C. Chialtas
- Georgelle C. Cuevas
- Scott D. Danforth
- Alexandria M. Davidson
- Michael J. Davis
- Mary Beth de Goede
- Anthony P. De Marco
- Peter E. Denno
- William A. Diedrich
- A. Christopher Duran
- Amy W. Estrada
- Jennifer R. Fain
- Eve P. Fichtner
- Paul S. Fleck
- Mellissa E. Gallegos
- Stephanie L. Garrett
- Karen E. Gilyard
- Todd A. Goluba
- Jacqueline D. Hang
- Davina F. Harden
- Suparna Jain
- Jonathan Judge
- Warren S. Kinsler
- Nate J. Kowalski
- Tien P. Le
- Alex A. Lozada
- Kimberly C. Ludwin
- Bryan G. Martin
- Paul Z. McGlocklin
- Stephen M. McLoughlin
- Anna J. Miller
- Jacquelyn Takeda Morenz
- Kristin M. Myers
- Katrina J. Nepacena
- Adam J. Newman
- Anthony P. Niccoli
- Aaron V. O'Donnell
- Sharon J. Ormond
- Gabrielle E. Ortiz
- Beverly A. Ozowara
- Chesley D. Quaide
- Rebeca Quintana
- Elizabeth J. Rho-Ng
- Todd M. Robbins
- Irma Rodríguez Moisa
- Brooke Romero
- Alyssa Ruiz de Esparza
- Lauren Ruvalcaba
- Scott J. Sachs
- Gabriel A. Sandoval
- Peter A. Schaffert
- Constance J. Schwindt
- Justin R. Shinnefield
- Amber M. Solano
- David A. Soldani
- Dustin Stroeve
- Constance M. Taylor
- Mark W. Thompson
- Emaleigh Valdez
- Jonathan S. Vick
- Jabari A. Willis
- Sara C. Young
- Elizabeth Zamora-Mejia
Archives
2024
2022
2021
2020
2019
2018
- December 2018
- September 2018
- August 2018
- July 2018
- June 2018
- May 2018
- April 2018
- March 2018
- January 2018
2017
- November 2017
- October 2017
- August 2017
- July 2017
- June 2017
- May 2017
- April 2017
- March 2017
- February 2017
- January 2017
2016
- November 2016
- October 2016
- September 2016
- August 2016
- July 2016
- June 2016
- May 2016
- April 2016
- March 2016
- February 2016
- January 2016
2015
- December 2015
- November 2015
- October 2015
- September 2015
- August 2015
- July 2015
- June 2015
- May 2015
- April 2015
- March 2015
- February 2015
- January 2015
2014
- December 2014
- November 2014
- October 2014
- September 2014
- August 2014
- July 2014
- June 2014
- May 2014
- April 2014
- March 2014
- February 2014
- January 2014
2013
- December 2013
- November 2013
- October 2013
- September 2013
- August 2013
- July 2013
- June 2013
- May 2013
- April 2013
- March 2013
- February 2013
- January 2013
2012
- December 2012
- November 2012
- October 2012
- September 2012
- August 2012
- July 2012
- June 2012
- May 2012
- April 2012
- March 2012
- February 2012
- January 2012