On November 22, 2016, a federal court in the Eastern District of Texas halted implementation the Department of Labor’s rule amending the salary basis test for overtime exemptions in the Fair Labor Standards Act (FLSA). The rule was scheduled to take effect December 1, 2016. (Nevada v. DOL (E.D.Tex. 11/22/16) No. 4:16-cv-00731.) The court granted a preliminary injunction, which temporarily delays the DOL’s rule from taking effect nationwide.
The DOL rule would have required employers to pay executive, administrative, and professional (so-called “white collar”) exempt employees at least $47,476 per year to be exempt from overtime. Until further action by the court, the federal salary basis will remain at its current level of $23,660.
The Department of Labor published its final rule on the salary basis test in May. Shortly thereafter, 21 states sued the DOL arguing that the DOL exceeded its authority in setting a salary threshold that more than doubled previous levels. The U.S. Chamber of Commerce and other business organizations filed a separate lawsuit, which was consolidated with the Nevada v. DOL case. On Tuesday, the court in Texas found that the DOL’s dramatic increase to the salary basis threshold created “essentially a de facto salary-only test,” which exceeded the authority granted to the DOL to interpret the FLSA.
The court also found that the higher salary threshold effectively eliminated from exempt status many employees who perform exempt duties, but fail to qualify solely due to the salary earned.
The lawsuit also asks the court to decide whether the DOL overstepped its authority in creating an automatic increase in the salary basis test every three years. The first increase is set to take effect on January 1, 2020.
What happens next depends on several factors. The preliminary injunction stops the DOL rule from taking effect until the court makes a final decision on the validity of the DOL’s rule. As the court explained, “A preliminary injunction preserves the status quo while the court determines the department’s authority to make the final rule as well as the final rule’s validity.”
In the meantime, the DOL is considering its legal options, which may include appealing the court decision. The DOL stated:
We strongly disagree with the decision by the court, which has the effect of delaying a fair day’s pay for a long day’s work for millions of hardworking Americans. The department’s overtime rule is the result of a comprehensive, inclusive rulemaking process, and we remain confident in the legality of all aspects of the rule.
If the DOL does not appeal the preliminary injunction, the parties will litigate whether a permanent injunction should be issued to stop the DOL rule from taking effect. In that case, the court may take months to reach a decision. President-elect Donald J. Trump may also initiate changes in the DOL, which falls under the Executive Branch, possibly leading DOL to withdraw the rule and propose an alternative.
For employers in California, the salary basis threshold under state law is $41,600 and is unaffected by the federal court ruling. The salary basis test for exempt employees in California will increase to $43,680 on January 1, 2017, when the state minimum wage increases to $10.50 per hour. Exempt employees must also satisfy a separate duties test to qualify as exempt, under both federal and state law.
As noted in our May 19, 2016 post the FLSA salary threshold does not apply to teachers or academic administrators. (29 C.F.R. §§ 541.303(d), 541.204(a)(1).)
Many employers have taken steps to comply with the DOL rule. Efforts to delay implementation at the last moment may be problematic if increases in pay or changes in status have already been communicated to employees. Given the new uncertainty of the DOL’s rule, employers — including public educational entities — should monitor the salary basis issue and consult with legal counsel regarding compensation options. If you have questions regarding the status of exempt employees and implementation of changes to compensation, please contact one of the authors.
- Partner
Sharon Ormond chairs AALRR’s Associate Mentoring and Training Committee and is a member of the firm’s Higher Education, Title IX, Civil Rights, and Wage and Hour teams. She represents numerous community college districts and ...
- Partner
Todd Robbins represents public school districts in the areas of education law, certificated and classified employee discipline, certificated layoffs, harassment and discrimination complaints, and contract ...
- Partner
Chesley (“Chet”) Quaide is the managing partner of Atkinson, Andelson, Loya, Ruud & Romo's Pleasanton office. He focuses his practice on education law, labor relations, and employment/labor law.
Mr. Quaide served as General ...
Other AALRR Blogs
Recent Posts
- AALRR’s 2024 Title IX Virtual Academy
- Unmasking Deepfakes: Legal Insights for School Districts
- How to Address Employees’ Use of Social Media
- How far is too far? Searching Students’ Homes and Remote Test Proctoring
- Making Cybersecurity a Priority
- U.S. Department of Education Issues Proposed Amendments to Title IX Regulations
- Inadvertent Disability Discrimination May Lurk in Hiring Software, Artificial Intelligence and Algorithms
- Students and Social Media – Can Schools Discipline Students for Off-Campus Speech?
- Fact Specific Analysis is Key when Restricting on Employee Expression
- Monitoring Students’ Online Activities
Popular Categories
- (55)
- (12)
- (81)
- (96)
- (43)
- (53)
- (22)
- (40)
- (11)
- (22)
- (6)
- (4)
- (3)
- (2)
- (3)
- (2)
- (4)
- (1)
- (1)
- (1)
- (1)
- (1)
- (1)
- (1)
Contributors
- Steven J. Andelson
- Ernest L. Bell
- William M. Betley
- Mark R. Bresee
- W. Bryce Chastain
- J. Kayleigh Chevrier
- Andreas C. Chialtas
- Georgelle C. Cuevas
- Scott D. Danforth
- Alexandria M. Davidson
- Mary Beth de Goede
- Anthony P. De Marco
- Peter E. Denno
- William A. Diedrich
- A. Christopher Duran
- Amy W. Estrada
- Jennifer R. Fain
- Eve P. Fichtner
- Paul S. Fleck
- Mellissa E. Gallegos
- Stephanie L. Garrett
- Karen E. Gilyard
- Todd A. Goluba
- Jacqueline D. Hang
- Davina F. Harden
- Suparna Jain
- Jonathan Judge
- Warren S. Kinsler
- Nate J. Kowalski
- Tien P. Le
- Alex A. Lozada
- Kimberly C. Ludwin
- Bryan G. Martin
- Paul Z. McGlocklin
- Stephen M. McLoughlin
- Anna J. Miller
- Jacquelyn Takeda Morenz
- Kristin M. Myers
- Katrina J. Nepacena
- Adam J. Newman
- Anthony P. Niccoli
- Aaron V. O'Donnell
- Sharon J. Ormond
- Gabrielle E. Ortiz
- Beverly A. Ozowara
- Chesley D. Quaide
- Rebeca Quintana
- Elizabeth J. Rho-Ng
- Todd M. Robbins
- Irma Rodríguez Moisa
- Brooke Romero
- Alyssa Ruiz de Esparza
- Lauren Ruvalcaba
- Scott J. Sachs
- Gabriel A. Sandoval
- Peter A. Schaffert
- Constance J. Schwindt
- Justin R. Shinnefield
- Amber M. Solano
- David A. Soldani
- Dustin Stroeve
- Constance M. Taylor
- Mark W. Thompson
- Emaleigh Valdez
- Jonathan S. Vick
- Jabari A. Willis
- Sara C. Young
- Elizabeth Zamora-Mejia
Archives
2024
2022
2021
2020
2019
2018
- December 2018
- September 2018
- August 2018
- July 2018
- June 2018
- May 2018
- April 2018
- March 2018
- January 2018
2017
- November 2017
- October 2017
- August 2017
- July 2017
- June 2017
- May 2017
- April 2017
- March 2017
- February 2017
- January 2017
2016
- November 2016
- October 2016
- September 2016
- August 2016
- July 2016
- June 2016
- May 2016
- April 2016
- March 2016
- February 2016
- January 2016
2015
- December 2015
- November 2015
- October 2015
- September 2015
- August 2015
- July 2015
- June 2015
- May 2015
- April 2015
- March 2015
- February 2015
- January 2015
2014
- December 2014
- November 2014
- October 2014
- September 2014
- August 2014
- July 2014
- June 2014
- May 2014
- April 2014
- March 2014
- February 2014
- January 2014
2013
- December 2013
- November 2013
- October 2013
- September 2013
- August 2013
- July 2013
- June 2013
- May 2013
- April 2013
- March 2013
- February 2013
- January 2013
2012
- December 2012
- November 2012
- October 2012
- September 2012
- August 2012
- July 2012
- June 2012
- May 2012
- April 2012
- March 2012
- February 2012
- January 2012