It is widely accepted that the time and cost to terminate a permanent certificated employee in California is excessive and presents an undue burden on public school employers. Accordingly, the Legislature is presently considering changes to the teacher termination process. While it is premature to speculate whether the changes under consideration will improve or further complicate the process, here is a brief overview of the existing process.
The termination of a permanent certificated employee is strictly by the Education Code. [Ed. Code §§ 44930, et seq.] The termination process is commenced serving a Notice of Intent to Dismiss. Generally, a Notice of Intent to Dismiss may not be filed between May 15 and September 15 of any school year. The employee has thirty (30) days from the date of service within which to request a hearing before a Commission on Professional Competence (“CPC”). If the employee requests a hearing, the employee must be served with an “Accusation” [Gov. Code § 11505] or the Board may elect to rescind its action. [Ed. Code § 44943.]
The CPC conducts the evidentiary hearing. The CPC consists of one member selected by the employee, one by the school district and an Administrative Law Judge (“ALJ”) appointed by the Office of Administrative Hearings. By law, the hearing is to be “commenced” within 60 days of the date of the employee’s request for a hearing, but hearings are customarily continued pending completion of pretrial proceedings. The hearing is conducted in accordance with rules prescribed under Administrative Procedures Act [Gov. Code §§ 11500, et seq.]. In addition, the employee is entitled to all the rights and duties of full civil discovery [Civ. Proc. Code § 2016.010]. [Ed. Code § 44944.] The decision of the CPC is deemed the final decision of the governing board. Either party may appeal the CPC’s decision to Superior Court. [Ed. Code § 44945.]
The causes for dismissal of a teacher are enumerated in Education Code section 44932(a). Absent a criminal conviction, the most common grounds for termination are:
1. Immoral or unprofessional conduct.
2. Dishonesty.
3. Unsatisfactory performance.
4. Evident unfitness for service.
5. Persistent violation of or refusal to obey the school laws of the state or reasonable regulation prescribed for by the government of the public schools by the State Board of Education or by the governing board of the school district employing him or her.
Although each of the above causes is an independent cause for dismissal, the determinative test is fitness to teach. The causes identified in the Education Code have been found to be so broad as and vague that, standing alone, they are deemed to be constitutionally deficient. Accordingly, the California Supreme Court has articulated several factors relevant to determining “fitness to teach.” [Morrison v. State Board of Education (1969) 1 Cal.3d 214.] The Morrison factors identified by the courts to determine whether a certificated employee is fit to teach include: (1) likelihood of recurrence of the questioned conduct; (2) extenuating or aggravating circumstances; (3) effect of notoriety and publicity; (4) impairment of teacher-student relationships; (5) disruption of the education process; (6) motive; (7) proximity or remoteness in time of conduct.
The Morrison factors have been applied to allegations of unprofessional conduct, immoral conduct, dishonesty, evident unfitness for service, and persistent violation or refusal to obey district regulations. While no reported case has specifically applied the Morrison factors to unsatisfactory performance, the weight of authority suggests the Morrison factors also apply to unsatisfactory performance.
The principal barrier to terminating a permanent certificated employee is the cost of protracted litigation. In our experience, the cost of terminating a certificated employee typically exceeds $100,000 for each party. Under California law, in addition to paying the costs of a hearing, the District must also pay the teacher’s legal fees and costs if the District does not prevail. These costs do not include the teacher’s salary and benefits pending trial. An unsuccessful teacher termination proceeding can easily end up costing a district more than $300,000. Thus, it is no surprise that most certificated employee dismissals result in a buy-out of the employee’s contract, rather than risk the costs of going to hearing.
- Partner
Chesley (“Chet”) Quaide is the managing partner of Atkinson, Andelson, Loya, Ruud & Romo's Pleasanton office. He focuses his practice on education law, labor relations, and employment/labor law.
Mr. Quaide served as General ...
Other AALRR Blogs
Recent Posts
- AALRR’s 2024 Title IX Virtual Academy
- Unmasking Deepfakes: Legal Insights for School Districts
- How to Address Employees’ Use of Social Media
- How far is too far? Searching Students’ Homes and Remote Test Proctoring
- Making Cybersecurity a Priority
- U.S. Department of Education Issues Proposed Amendments to Title IX Regulations
- Inadvertent Disability Discrimination May Lurk in Hiring Software, Artificial Intelligence and Algorithms
- Students and Social Media – Can Schools Discipline Students for Off-Campus Speech?
- Fact Specific Analysis is Key when Restricting on Employee Expression
- Monitoring Students’ Online Activities
Popular Categories
- (55)
- (12)
- (81)
- (96)
- (43)
- (53)
- (22)
- (40)
- (11)
- (22)
- (6)
- (4)
- (3)
- (2)
- (3)
- (2)
- (4)
- (1)
- (1)
- (1)
- (1)
- (1)
- (1)
- (1)
Contributors
- Steven J. Andelson
- Ernest L. Bell
- William M. Betley
- Mark R. Bresee
- W. Bryce Chastain
- J. Kayleigh Chevrier
- Andreas C. Chialtas
- Georgelle C. Cuevas
- Scott D. Danforth
- Alexandria M. Davidson
- Mary Beth de Goede
- Anthony P. De Marco
- Peter E. Denno
- William A. Diedrich
- A. Christopher Duran
- Amy W. Estrada
- Jennifer R. Fain
- Eve P. Fichtner
- Paul S. Fleck
- Mellissa E. Gallegos
- Stephanie L. Garrett
- Karen E. Gilyard
- Todd A. Goluba
- Jacqueline D. Hang
- Davina F. Harden
- Suparna Jain
- Jonathan Judge
- Warren S. Kinsler
- Nate J. Kowalski
- Tien P. Le
- Alex A. Lozada
- Kimberly C. Ludwin
- Bryan G. Martin
- Paul Z. McGlocklin
- Stephen M. McLoughlin
- Anna J. Miller
- Jacquelyn Takeda Morenz
- Kristin M. Myers
- Katrina J. Nepacena
- Adam J. Newman
- Anthony P. Niccoli
- Aaron V. O'Donnell
- Sharon J. Ormond
- Gabrielle E. Ortiz
- Beverly A. Ozowara
- Chesley D. Quaide
- Rebeca Quintana
- Elizabeth J. Rho-Ng
- Todd M. Robbins
- Irma Rodríguez Moisa
- Brooke Romero
- Alyssa Ruiz de Esparza
- Lauren Ruvalcaba
- Scott J. Sachs
- Gabriel A. Sandoval
- Peter A. Schaffert
- Constance J. Schwindt
- Justin R. Shinnefield
- Amber M. Solano
- David A. Soldani
- Dustin Stroeve
- Constance M. Taylor
- Mark W. Thompson
- Emaleigh Valdez
- Jonathan S. Vick
- Jabari A. Willis
- Sara C. Young
- Elizabeth Zamora-Mejia
Archives
2024
2022
2021
2020
2019
2018
- December 2018
- September 2018
- August 2018
- July 2018
- June 2018
- May 2018
- April 2018
- March 2018
- January 2018
2017
- November 2017
- October 2017
- August 2017
- July 2017
- June 2017
- May 2017
- April 2017
- March 2017
- February 2017
- January 2017
2016
- November 2016
- October 2016
- September 2016
- August 2016
- July 2016
- June 2016
- May 2016
- April 2016
- March 2016
- February 2016
- January 2016
2015
- December 2015
- November 2015
- October 2015
- September 2015
- August 2015
- July 2015
- June 2015
- May 2015
- April 2015
- March 2015
- February 2015
- January 2015
2014
- December 2014
- November 2014
- October 2014
- September 2014
- August 2014
- July 2014
- June 2014
- May 2014
- April 2014
- March 2014
- February 2014
- January 2014
2013
- December 2013
- November 2013
- October 2013
- September 2013
- August 2013
- July 2013
- June 2013
- May 2013
- April 2013
- March 2013
- February 2013
- January 2013
2012
- December 2012
- November 2012
- October 2012
- September 2012
- August 2012
- July 2012
- June 2012
- May 2012
- April 2012
- March 2012
- February 2012
- January 2012