In a decision of first impression, the Fourth District Court of Appeal has held that a public school employee is not immune from a lawsuit for disclosing a Suspected Child Abuse Report (“SCAR”) to anyone other than those specifically listed in the Child Abuse and Neglect Reporting Act (Penal Code §§ 11164, et seq.; “CANRA”). Additionally, public school employers may be liable for an employee’s negligent disclosure of a SCAR.
In Cuff v. Grossmont Union High School District (Case No. D062278 [November 18, 2013]), a father accompanied his two sons to their high school to report that their mother had physically and verbally abused them. The three met with Susan Saunders, a school counselor and designated “mandated reporter” under CANRA. As a mandated reporter, Ms. Saunders was required to report suspected child abuse and neglect to certain authorities identified by CANRA. Based on what the boys told her, Ms. Saunders prepared a SCAR outlining the alleged abuse they suffered and forwarded it to Child Welfare Services. Ms. Saunders also gave a copy to the boys’ father so he could deliver it to a law enforcement agency with the goal of taking the boys into protective custody.
Instead of taking the SCAR to a law enforcement agency, father, who was divorced from the boys’ mother and did not have custody, took it to superior court to file an application for a protective order against the boys’ mother and obtain sole custody. Ultimately, the court denied the application and ordered that the boys’ mother retain sole legal and physical custody. In turn, the boys’ mother sued Ms. Saunders and the school district alleging an invasion of privacy under CANRA for the unwarranted disclosure of the SCAR to the boys’ father. Ms. Saunders and her employer argued that the lawsuit must be dismissed because Ms. Saunders enjoyed immunity, as the release of the SCAR was a “discretionary act” and thus Ms. Saunders was protected from liability. (Gov. Code § 820.2.) The trial court agreed and granted summary judgment in favor of Ms. Saunders and her employer. Mother appealed the decision.
The Court of Appeal disagreed with the trial court and ruled in mother’s favor. The court examined CANRA, which provides that SCARs are confidential and may be disclosed only to certain designated persons and entities. (Penal Code § 11167.5.) The court recognized that releasing a SCAR to any other person or entity is punishable as a crime. Because a mandated reporter is prohibited from disclosing SCARs to anyone other than those listed in CANRA, a mandated reporter does not have “discretion” whether to release a SCAR; therefore, employees do not enjoy immunity under the Government Code for otherwise discretionary acts. Accordingly, the court reversed the trial court and ordered that the lawsuit be allowed to proceed on the merits.
Two other features of the Cuff decision are important. First, the court held unequivocally that a SCAR is not a “pupil record” under the Education Code. The court ruled that labeling a SCAR as a pupil record would undermine the purpose of CANRA because pupil records may be viewed by persons not identified in Penal Code section 11167.5. Second, the court acknowledged that a mandated reporter’s release of a SCAR in violation of CANRA can subject his or her employer to liability. The court pointed to Government Code section 815.2, which provides that a public employer is liable for the unlawful acts or omissions of its employees (commonly referred to as “derivative liability”). In the Cuff matter, Ms. Saunders did not qualify for immunity based on her release of the SCAR. As a result, her employer was likewise subject to liability.
The Cuff case reaffirms that mandated reporters are held to the strictest standards of confidentiality. It is a sobering reminder to mandated reporters that even with the best intentions, the unauthorized release of confidential information can lead to serious consequences. Employers are encouraged to remind their mandated reporters of CANRA’s confidentiality provisions, especially considering that the unauthorized release of information may subject them to civil and criminal liability, and the costs of defending a lawsuit.
- Partner
Paul McGlocklin represents school districts, community college districts, and county offices of education, focusing on classified and certificated employment matters and other labor and employment issues. He also handles ...
- Partner
Bill Diedrich represents school districts, community college districts, and other public agencies in all aspects of labor and employment law.
Having served for more than a decade as Chief Negotiator for school districts and ...
Other AALRR Blogs
Recent Posts
- AALRR’s 2024 Title IX Virtual Academy
- Unmasking Deepfakes: Legal Insights for School Districts
- How to Address Employees’ Use of Social Media
- How far is too far? Searching Students’ Homes and Remote Test Proctoring
- Making Cybersecurity a Priority
- U.S. Department of Education Issues Proposed Amendments to Title IX Regulations
- Inadvertent Disability Discrimination May Lurk in Hiring Software, Artificial Intelligence and Algorithms
- Students and Social Media – Can Schools Discipline Students for Off-Campus Speech?
- Fact Specific Analysis is Key when Restricting on Employee Expression
- Monitoring Students’ Online Activities
Popular Categories
- (55)
- (12)
- (81)
- (96)
- (43)
- (53)
- (22)
- (40)
- (11)
- (22)
- (6)
- (4)
- (3)
- (2)
- (3)
- (2)
- (4)
- (1)
- (1)
- (1)
- (1)
- (1)
- (1)
- (1)
Contributors
- Steven J. Andelson
- Ernest L. Bell
- William M. Betley
- Mark R. Bresee
- W. Bryce Chastain
- J. Kayleigh Chevrier
- Andreas C. Chialtas
- Georgelle C. Cuevas
- Scott D. Danforth
- Alexandria M. Davidson
- Mary Beth de Goede
- Anthony P. De Marco
- Peter E. Denno
- William A. Diedrich
- A. Christopher Duran
- Amy W. Estrada
- Jennifer R. Fain
- Eve P. Fichtner
- Paul S. Fleck
- Mellissa E. Gallegos
- Stephanie L. Garrett
- Karen E. Gilyard
- Todd A. Goluba
- Jacqueline D. Hang
- Davina F. Harden
- Suparna Jain
- Jonathan Judge
- Warren S. Kinsler
- Nate J. Kowalski
- Tien P. Le
- Alex A. Lozada
- Kimberly C. Ludwin
- Bryan G. Martin
- Paul Z. McGlocklin
- Stephen M. McLoughlin
- Anna J. Miller
- Jacquelyn Takeda Morenz
- Kristin M. Myers
- Katrina J. Nepacena
- Adam J. Newman
- Anthony P. Niccoli
- Aaron V. O'Donnell
- Sharon J. Ormond
- Gabrielle E. Ortiz
- Beverly A. Ozowara
- Chesley D. Quaide
- Rebeca Quintana
- Elizabeth J. Rho-Ng
- Todd M. Robbins
- Irma Rodríguez Moisa
- Brooke Romero
- Alyssa Ruiz de Esparza
- Lauren Ruvalcaba
- Scott J. Sachs
- Gabriel A. Sandoval
- Peter A. Schaffert
- Constance J. Schwindt
- Justin R. Shinnefield
- Amber M. Solano
- David A. Soldani
- Dustin Stroeve
- Constance M. Taylor
- Mark W. Thompson
- Emaleigh Valdez
- Jonathan S. Vick
- Jabari A. Willis
- Sara C. Young
- Elizabeth Zamora-Mejia
Archives
2024
2022
2021
2020
2019
2018
- December 2018
- September 2018
- August 2018
- July 2018
- June 2018
- May 2018
- April 2018
- March 2018
- January 2018
2017
- November 2017
- October 2017
- August 2017
- July 2017
- June 2017
- May 2017
- April 2017
- March 2017
- February 2017
- January 2017
2016
- November 2016
- October 2016
- September 2016
- August 2016
- July 2016
- June 2016
- May 2016
- April 2016
- March 2016
- February 2016
- January 2016
2015
- December 2015
- November 2015
- October 2015
- September 2015
- August 2015
- July 2015
- June 2015
- May 2015
- April 2015
- March 2015
- February 2015
- January 2015
2014
- December 2014
- November 2014
- October 2014
- September 2014
- August 2014
- July 2014
- June 2014
- May 2014
- April 2014
- March 2014
- February 2014
- January 2014
2013
- December 2013
- November 2013
- October 2013
- September 2013
- August 2013
- July 2013
- June 2013
- May 2013
- April 2013
- March 2013
- February 2013
- January 2013
2012
- December 2012
- November 2012
- October 2012
- September 2012
- August 2012
- July 2012
- June 2012
- May 2012
- April 2012
- March 2012
- February 2012
- January 2012