On April 26, 2016, the U.S. Supreme Court issued its opinion in Heffernan v. City of Paterson, No. 14–1280, finding that a police officer who was demoted after being seen talking to a mayoral candidate’s campaign team can assert a claim that he was deprived of his constitutionally protected rights under 42 U.S.C. section 1983, even though his employer was mistaken about the fact that he had engaged in political activity. This case illustrates that when a government employer subjects an employee to an adverse employment action based on the employer’s mistaken belief that the employee engaged in constitutionally protected activity, that mistake will not save the employer from liability under Section 1983.
In 2005, the mayor of Paterson, New Jersey, was running a contested reelection campaign. Jeffrey Heffernan was a police officer for the city and a good friend of the mayor’s opponent. The police chief and the officer who directly supervised Heffernan were appointed to their positions by the mayor. Heffernan’s mother, who supported the opposing candidate, asked Heffernan to pick up a yard sign from one of the opponent’s campaign sites because she was too sick to do so. Police officers observed Heffernan talking with the opponent’s campaign staff while holding the sign, and word quickly spread through the department. The next day, Heffernan was demoted from detective to patrol officer due to his “overt involvement” in the opponent’s campaign.
Heffernan sued the department under Section 1983 (a post-Civil War statute that protects individuals from violations of their constitutional rights by persons acting under “color” of state law), claiming he was demoted based on the mistaken belief he had engaged in constitutionally protected conduct. The district court held Heffernan had not engaged in conduct protected by the First Amendment. The Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit affirmed, holding a Section 1983 claim can be asserted only when the adverse action was “prompted by the employee’s actual, rather than perceived, exercise of constitutional rights.”
The Supreme Court reversed, making an analogy to Waters v. Churchill (1994) 511 U.S. 661, where the Court upheld the dismissal of an employee based on the employer’s mistaken, but reasonable, belief that the employee spoke out on matters of personal concern (such speech would not be protected). The Court concluded the government’s reason for demoting Heffernan was “what counts” and held when an employer demotes an employee out of a desire to prevent the employee from engaging in political activity, the employee may claim a deprivation of rights under Section 1983, even if the employer is mistaken about the employee’s political activity.
The First Amendment prohibits governmental action that abridges an individual’s freedom of speech. The Court’s focus was on the department’s actions, taken pursuant to its policy, regardless of whether Heffernan actually engaged in protected activity. Additionally, the Court concluded an employer’s factual mistake about an employee’s conduct does not diminish the harm caused by the adverse action, which has the effect of discouraging other employees from engaging in constitutionally protected activities. Finally, the Court reasoned its holding would not impose significant extra costs on the employer; if anything, the rule would require plaintiffs to prove a more complicated and costly claim.
The Court noted there was some evidence Heffernan was demoted pursuant to a neutral departmental policy prohibiting police officers from any overt involvement in any political campaign. The Court remanded the case for further proceedings regarding whether such a policy existed, whether the city demoted Heffernan because of such a policy, and whether the policy was constitutionally valid.
Other AALRR Blogs
Recent Posts
- AALRR’s 2024 Title IX Virtual Academy
- Unmasking Deepfakes: Legal Insights for School Districts
- How to Address Employees’ Use of Social Media
- How far is too far? Searching Students’ Homes and Remote Test Proctoring
- Making Cybersecurity a Priority
- U.S. Department of Education Issues Proposed Amendments to Title IX Regulations
- Inadvertent Disability Discrimination May Lurk in Hiring Software, Artificial Intelligence and Algorithms
- Students and Social Media – Can Schools Discipline Students for Off-Campus Speech?
- Fact Specific Analysis is Key when Restricting on Employee Expression
- Monitoring Students’ Online Activities
Popular Categories
- (55)
- (12)
- (81)
- (96)
- (43)
- (53)
- (22)
- (40)
- (11)
- (22)
- (6)
- (4)
- (3)
- (2)
- (3)
- (2)
- (4)
- (1)
- (1)
- (1)
- (1)
- (1)
- (1)
- (1)
Contributors
- Steven J. Andelson
- Ernest L. Bell
- William M. Betley
- Mark R. Bresee
- W. Bryce Chastain
- J. Kayleigh Chevrier
- Andreas C. Chialtas
- Georgelle C. Cuevas
- Scott D. Danforth
- Alexandria M. Davidson
- Mary Beth de Goede
- Anthony P. De Marco
- Peter E. Denno
- William A. Diedrich
- A. Christopher Duran
- Amy W. Estrada
- Jennifer R. Fain
- Eve P. Fichtner
- Paul S. Fleck
- Mellissa E. Gallegos
- Stephanie L. Garrett
- Karen E. Gilyard
- Todd A. Goluba
- Jacqueline D. Hang
- Davina F. Harden
- Suparna Jain
- Jonathan Judge
- Warren S. Kinsler
- Nate J. Kowalski
- Tien P. Le
- Alex A. Lozada
- Kimberly C. Ludwin
- Bryan G. Martin
- Paul Z. McGlocklin
- Stephen M. McLoughlin
- Anna J. Miller
- Jacquelyn Takeda Morenz
- Kristin M. Myers
- Katrina J. Nepacena
- Adam J. Newman
- Anthony P. Niccoli
- Aaron V. O'Donnell
- Sharon J. Ormond
- Gabrielle E. Ortiz
- Beverly A. Ozowara
- Chesley D. Quaide
- Rebeca Quintana
- Elizabeth J. Rho-Ng
- Todd M. Robbins
- Irma Rodríguez Moisa
- Brooke Romero
- Alyssa Ruiz de Esparza
- Lauren Ruvalcaba
- Scott J. Sachs
- Gabriel A. Sandoval
- Peter A. Schaffert
- Constance J. Schwindt
- Justin R. Shinnefield
- Amber M. Solano
- David A. Soldani
- Dustin Stroeve
- Constance M. Taylor
- Mark W. Thompson
- Emaleigh Valdez
- Jonathan S. Vick
- Jabari A. Willis
- Sara C. Young
- Elizabeth Zamora-Mejia
Archives
2024
2022
2021
2020
2019
2018
- December 2018
- September 2018
- August 2018
- July 2018
- June 2018
- May 2018
- April 2018
- March 2018
- January 2018
2017
- November 2017
- October 2017
- August 2017
- July 2017
- June 2017
- May 2017
- April 2017
- March 2017
- February 2017
- January 2017
2016
- November 2016
- October 2016
- September 2016
- August 2016
- July 2016
- June 2016
- May 2016
- April 2016
- March 2016
- February 2016
- January 2016
2015
- December 2015
- November 2015
- October 2015
- September 2015
- August 2015
- July 2015
- June 2015
- May 2015
- April 2015
- March 2015
- February 2015
- January 2015
2014
- December 2014
- November 2014
- October 2014
- September 2014
- August 2014
- July 2014
- June 2014
- May 2014
- April 2014
- March 2014
- February 2014
- January 2014
2013
- December 2013
- November 2013
- October 2013
- September 2013
- August 2013
- July 2013
- June 2013
- May 2013
- April 2013
- March 2013
- February 2013
- January 2013
2012
- December 2012
- November 2012
- October 2012
- September 2012
- August 2012
- July 2012
- June 2012
- May 2012
- April 2012
- March 2012
- February 2012
- January 2012