On May 31, 2013, the California Court of Appeal reversed the conviction of Karen Christiansen for violation of Government Code section 1090, which generally prohibits public officials from being financially interested in contracts they make in their official capacity. (People v. Christiansen, see decision here.) Because the Court concluded that Christiansen was an independent contractor, not an employee, officer or member of the governing board, the Court held that Christiansen could not be prosecuted for a violation of section 1090. The court reversed her conviction, and vacated her sentence and the restitution award of $3.4 million.
Ms. Christiansen had originally been employed by the Beverly Hills Unified School District as the “Director of Planning and Facilities” in 2004. In 2006, she and the District agreed to terminate her employer-employee relationship, but she continued to provide services as a consultant pursuant to an independent contractor agreement. Her duties included the same responsibilities she had as the Director of Planning and Facilities, except for those duties and responsibilities which would be precluded due to her change in status. In 2007, she assigned her interests in her contract to Strategic Concepts, LLC of which she was the sole member and owner. Strategic Concepts thereafter contracted directly with the District.
Most of the criminal charges stemmed from contracts entered into by the District with Johnson Controls, a company which handles energy conservation and renewable energy projects for public schools. The prosecution’s theory for three of the criminal charges was that Strategic Concepts’ consulting agreement with Johnson Controls gave Christiansen an indirect financial interest in the District’s contracts with Johnson Controls and that for purposes of section 1090, Christiansen was an “employee.” The prosecution’s theory for still another charge was that Christiansen had made a contract with the District in her official capacity while having a financial interest in that contract.
Since section 1090 does not define the term “employee,” the Court applied the common law test and concluded that independent contractors are not “employees” for purposes of a criminal case brought under section 1090. The Court criticized the reasoning of two earlier California civil cases which had expanded the definition of “employee” to include independent contractors. The Court stopped short, however, of expressing a contrary opinion on the soundness of those opinions in the civil context. (See HUB Solid Waste Services, Inc. v. City of Compton (2010) 186 Cal.App.4th 1114; California Housing Finance Agency v. Hanover/California Management & Accounting Center, Inc. (2007) 148 Cal.App.4th 682.)
In February, 2013, Assemblyman Wieckowski introduced AB 1059, a bill which would extend the application of section 1090 to independent contractors. According to Assemblyman Wieckowski’s staff, with whom we spoke by telephone, the bill will be a two-year bill and will be revisited in 2014.
This is an issue which is worth following closely. We do not know whether Christiansen’s criminal case will be appealed. If the decision remains good law, the outcome of future civil cases brought under section 1090 against independent contractors will be uncertain given the disparities between various appellate decisions.
- Partner
Chesley Quaide focuses on education law and labor relations and employment/labor law. He served as General Counsel of the Merced County Office of Education from 1991-2004, and has served as General Counsel of the Stanislaus ...
Other AALRR Blogs
Recent Posts
- Brown Act — Confidentiality of Closed Session Information
- Leading and Managing Employees Remotely: Telecommuting in Education
- Is Your Website ADA-Compliant? Web Accessibility Lawsuits May Soon Be On the Rise as California High Courts Expand the Reach of the Americans with Disabilities Act and the Unruh Civil Rights Act
- Proactive Steps to Combat Microaggressions and Unconscious Bias in the Workplace
- “But It’s on the Internet!” You Still Need a License to Use that Photo!
- U.S. Supreme Court Lets Stand School District Policy Supportive of Transgender Students
- Failure to Comply with the EEOC’s Claim-filing Requirements May Not Bar Courts from Hearing Discrimination Cases
- New Bill Would Expand Ban on Suspensions for “Willful Defiance”
- New Developments in Ongoing Website Accessibility Litigation
- Will Smartphones in Classrooms Be a Thing of the Past?
Popular Categories
- (96)
- (51)
- (80)
- (42)
- (53)
- (20)
- (40)
- (7)
- (6)
- (22)
- (8)
- (3)
- (3)
- (1)
- (4)
- (1)
- (1)
- (1)
- (1)
- (1)
- (1)
- (1)
- (1)
Contributors
- Lisa R. Allred
- Steven J. Andelson
- Christopher S. Andre
- Ernest L. Bell
- William M. Betley
- Mark R. Bresee
- W. Bryce Chastain
- Andreas C. Chialtas
- Georgelle C. Cuevas
- Kevin R. Dale
- Scott D. Danforth
- Alexandria M. Davidson
- Mary Beth de Goede
- Anthony P. De Marco
- Peter E. Denno
- William A. Diedrich
- A. Christopher Duran
- Amy W. Estrada
- Jennifer R. Fain
- Eve P. Fichtner
- Paul S. Fleck
- Mellissa E. Gallegos
- Karen E. Gilyard
- Todd A. Goluba
- Jacqueline D. Hang
- Davina F. Harden
- Martin A. Hom
- Suparna Jain
- Jonathan Judge
- Tina L. Kannarr
- Warren S. Kinsler
- Nate J. Kowalski
- Michele A. Landenberger
- Alex A. Lozada
- Kimberly C. Ludwin
- Bryan G. Martin
- Paul Z. McGlocklin
- Stephen M. McLoughlin
- Anna J. Miller
- Marilou F. Mirkovich
- Jacquelyn T. Morenz
- Joshua E. Morrison
- Kristin M. Myers
- Adam J. Newman
- Anthony P. Niccoli
- Aaron V. O'Donnell
- Sharon J. Ormond
- Gabrielle E. Ortiz
- Chesley D. Quaide
- Elizabeth J. Rho-Ng
- Todd M. Robbins
- Irma Rodríguez Moisa
- Brooke Romero
- Alyssa Ruiz de Esparza
- Scott J. Sachs
- Gabriel A. Sandoval
- Peter A. Schaffert
- Constance J. Schwindt
- Justin R. Shinnefield
- Amber M. Solano
- David A. Soldani
- Constance M. Taylor
- Mark W. Thompson
- Jonathan S. Vick
- Jabari A. Willis
- Sara C. Young
- Elizabeth Zamora-Mejia
Archives
2020
2019
2018
- December 2018
- September 2018
- August 2018
- July 2018
- June 2018
- May 2018
- April 2018
- March 2018
- January 2018
2017
- November 2017
- October 2017
- August 2017
- July 2017
- June 2017
- May 2017
- April 2017
- March 2017
- February 2017
- January 2017
2016
- November 2016
- October 2016
- September 2016
- August 2016
- July 2016
- June 2016
- May 2016
- April 2016
- March 2016
- February 2016
- January 2016
2015
- December 2015
- November 2015
- October 2015
- September 2015
- August 2015
- July 2015
- June 2015
- May 2015
- April 2015
- March 2015
- February 2015
- January 2015
2014
- December 2014
- November 2014
- October 2014
- September 2014
- August 2014
- July 2014
- June 2014
- May 2014
- April 2014
- March 2014
- February 2014
- January 2014
2013
- December 2013
- November 2013
- October 2013
- September 2013
- August 2013
- July 2013
- June 2013
- May 2013
- April 2013
- March 2013
- February 2013
- January 2013
2012
- December 2012
- November 2012
- October 2012
- September 2012
- August 2012
- July 2012
- June 2012
- May 2012
- April 2012
- March 2012
- February 2012
- January 2012