Last week, CalPERS issued Circular Letters informing school and state employers of their expected contribution rates for the 2017-18 fiscal year. These rates go into effect with the first payroll period that ends in July 2017.
School employers will contribute 15.531% of compensation, an increase from the current 13.888%. Total contributions will rise from nearly $1.7 billion to $2 billion. As to employees, “Classic” members will continue to contribute 7% of their reportable compensation while contributions from “new members” subject to the Public Employees’ Pension Reform Act (PEPRA) will increase from 6% to 6.5%.
As shown in the Circular Letter, contribution rates are more complicated for state employers. For one thing, there are five types of employees, each with a different contribution rate. For another, Government Code section 20683.2(d) provides that the Legislature may increase state employer contribution rates by the amount saved as a result of employee contribution rate increases. The Legislature increased rates last year and is expected to do so again this year. These additional contribution rates range from .881% for a “State Industrial Member” to 1.647% for a “Peace Officer/Firefighter Member.”
State employer rates, which include the additional statutory contribution, are as follows:
- State Miscellaneous Member: 28.423%
- State Industrial Member: 20.408%
- State Safety Member: 20.584%
- California Highway Patrol Member: 54.104%
- Peace Officer/Firefighter Member: 44.245%
This year, state employers contributed $5.4 billion to CalPERS. Next year, they will contribute $5.9 billion.
Explanation for the Increases
On April 18, the CalPERS Finance and Administration Committee explained the increased contribution rates were caused by amortization of losses, increased salaries, lowering of the assumed rate of return from 7.5% to 7.375%, and other factors.
Unfortunately, employer contribution rates are not expected to decrease any time soon, though the increase is less than the CalPERS Board predicted in February.
 The Circular Letter erroneously refers to subsection (c) rather than (d).
Nate Kowalski is Chair of the firm’s Public Entity Labor and Employment Practice Group. He is an accomplished litigator who represents employers in both the private and public sectors. Mr. Kowalski has litigated hundreds of ...
Jorge Luna has been practicing law since 1996 in a variety of areas, including employment, construction, business litigation, intellectual property and entertainment. For the past 12 years, Mr. Luna has focused his practice ...
- Senior Counsel
Joshua Morrison represents California public school districts in all aspects of general education law. His areas of specialty practice include public employee discipline/dismissal, administrative hearings, matters before ...
Other AALRR Blogs
- California Supreme Court Hears Cal Fire Oral Argument
- Amortization Period for New Debt Shortened to 20 Years
- New CalPERS Compensation Limits, Effective Immediately
- CalPERS Responds to Its Critics
- Senate Bill 525 Amends California Public Pension Laws
- New Stanford University Study Predicts Public Pensions Costs in California to Consume 14-17.5% of Operating Expenses by the Year 2030
- New Law Penalizes Employers Who Fail to Provide Information About Annuitants Working During Retirement
- Appellate Court Holds That MOU Does Not Provide Vested Interest in Retiree Medical Benefits
- PERB Allows School District to Enforce Longstanding, but Previously Unenforced Limits on the Employer Contribution for Post-Retirement Medical Benefits
- Curtailing Police Pensions: Not As Simple As It May Seem