As reported by the Sacramento Bee, last week the California Senate’s Public Employment and Retirement Committee voted down by a three-two margin Senate Bill 32, which had been aimed at reducing public pensions’ unfunded liabilities. Republican Senator John Moorlach from Costa Mesa brought the bill; many union representatives testified against it.
SB 32 was modeled after last year’s climate change bill, also called SB 32, which aimed to reduce greenhouse gas emissions to 40 percent below 1990 levels by 2030. Senator Moorlach’s bill demanded that CalPERS and CalSTRS reduce their unfunded liability to 1980 levels by 2030. To attain that goal, pensioners’ cost-of-living increases would be frozen, local governments would be required to increase their contribution rates by 10 percent, public employers would have to offer hybrid plans combining traditional pensions and defined contribution plans, and pensions for members joining the system after January 1, 2018 would be calculated based on their highest average compensation over 60 consecutive months or five consecutive school years, rather than the current 12 or 36 consecutive months.
Although many people assert the Public Employees’ Pension Reform Act of 2013 (PEPRA) did not go far enough to reduce unfunded liabilities, Senator Moorlach’s bill may have gone too far. It is impossible to satisfy everyone. However, one can hope to achieve a middle ground which both secures future pension funds and fairly compensates public employees and retirees.
Joshua Morrison represents California public school districts in all aspects of general education law. His areas of specialty practice include public employee discipline/dismissal, administrative hearings, matters before ...
Nate Kowalski is Chair of the firm’s Public Entity Labor and Employment Practice Group. He is an accomplished litigator who represents employers in both the private and public sectors. Mr. Kowalski has litigated hundreds of ...
Jorge Luna has been practicing law since 1996 in a variety of areas, including employment, construction, business litigation, intellectual property and entertainment. For the past 15 years, Mr. Luna has focused his practice ...
Other AALRR Blogs
- “California Rule” Survives (For Now) — But “Airtime” Does Not
- Be Cautious About “DROP” Programs
- California Supreme Court Hears Cal Fire Oral Argument
- Amortization Period for New Debt Shortened to 20 Years
- New CalPERS Compensation Limits, Effective Immediately
- CalPERS Responds to Its Critics
- Senate Bill 525 Amends California Public Pension Laws
- New Stanford University Study Predicts Public Pensions Costs in California to Consume 14-17.5% of Operating Expenses by the Year 2030
- New Law Penalizes Employers Who Fail to Provide Information About Annuitants Working During Retirement
- Appellate Court Holds That MOU Does Not Provide Vested Interest in Retiree Medical Benefits