[This is the second in a series of blog posts on how businesses should prepare for the California Privacy Rights Act which will enter into force on January 1, 2023]
When the California Privacy Rights Act (“CPRA”) takes effect on January 1, 2023 it will bring sweeping changes to data retention requirements in California.[1] Historically, many companies have over-retained data (and understandably so, since most risks under older laws related to a failure to keep data). The CPRA changes the data-retention landscape significantly by requiring companies to justify and disclose their retention policies, and to limit retention periods to only the time necessary to fulfill the company’s disclosed purpose for retaining.
[1] Final regulations under the CPRA are still pending and the information provided herein is subject to modification. This guidance also does not cover data retention principles under statutes other than CPRA.
RSS Feed
Follow us on Facebook
Follow us on Twitter/X
Follow us on LinkedInOther AALRR Blogs
Recent Posts
- A Plaintiff, a Defendant, and a Judge Walk Into an AI Trap
- Watch Out For Insurance Policy Sublimits That Can Result In Less Coverage For Claims
- A Prevailing Plaintiff On A Financial Elder Abuse Claim Is Entitled To An Award Of All Fees Intertwined With The Prosecution Of Such A Claim Which Includes The Successful Defense Of A Competing Claim For Elder Abuse
- A Derivative Plaintiff Who Defeats an Initial Bond Motion Must Still Pay the Ordinary Costs that Go to the Victor if They Lose at Trial
- Density Bonus Agreement Survives Foreclosure: California Court Rules Affordable Housing Covenant Equivalent to Permit Condition
- Can You Contract Away Your Right to a California Jury Trial? The California Supreme Court Clarifies the Limits of Forum Selection Clauses in Contracts Formed in California
- Federal Judges Find Use of Copyrighted Books to Train AI is Fair Use But Differ in How They Get There
- Trademarks in the Age of AI: The Emerging Legal Battlefield for Brand Owners and Users of Generative AI
- Considerations in Enforcing a Broad Release and Waiver of Liability Form
- Recent California Supreme Court Decision Encourages Parties to Make Reasonable Settlement Offers (aka a 998 Offer) as Early as Possible
Popular Categories
- (32)
- (31)
- (1)
- (7)
- (7)
- (5)
- (15)
- (3)
- (4)
- (2)
- (1)
- (3)
- (1)
- (3)
- (1)
- (2)
- (4)
- (5)
- (2)
- (2)
- (1)
- (2)
- (3)
- (1)
- (2)
- (1)
- (1)
- (1)
- (1)
- (1)
- (1)
- (1)
- (1)
- (1)
- (1)
- (1)
- (1)
- (1)
- (1)
- (1)
Contributors
- Cindy Strom Arellano
- Gary A. Barrera
- Eduardo A. Carvajal
- Michele L. Collender
- Scott K. Dauscher
- Christopher M. Francis
- Evan J. Gautier
- Carol A. Gefis
- Edward C. Ho
- Micah R. Jacobs
- John E. James
- Jonathan Judge
- David Kang
- Jeannie Y. Kang
- Michael H. Kang
- Matthew D. Kramer
- Joseph K. Lee
- Thomas A. Lenz
- Shawn M. Ogle
- Kenneth L. Perkins, Jr.
- Jon M. Setoguchi
- Ryan C. Squire
- McKenna Stephens
- Jon Ustundag
- Brian M. Wheeler